Laserfiche WebLink
Councilman Rosselli moved to introduce Ordinance of the City of Redwood City <br />adopting the Final Budget of the City of Redwood City for the fiscal year July 1, <br />1967 -June 30, 1968; providing for the appropriation and expenditure of all sums <br />set forth in said Budget; providing for emergency expenditures, transfers, addi- <br />tional appropriations and cancellation of existing appropriations; and, repealing <br />Ordinance No. 1249, as amended, and all Ordinances and Resolutions in conflict <br />herewith; and, adopting the Budgets for General Improvement Districts No. 1-64, <br />Nos. 1-65, 2-65, 3-65 for the fiscal year July 1, 1967 - June 30, 1968" seconded <br />by Councilman Keckley. <br />Comments were made by Council members on the fact lengthy review and study of <br />Budget for coming fiscal year had resulted in same tax rate as previous year for <br />the budget as adopted. Motion carried. <br />PUBLIC HEARING, Notice to abate nuisance at 1327 Hancock Street, declared open and <br />affidavit of posting ordered filed. Chief Building Official duly sworn in by <br />City Clerk before presenting his testimony. Written evidence to substantiate his <br />testimony was submitted, including the following: <br />Complete documentation of records which had been compiled as the basis for <br />his recommendation that this hazardous building be demolished and the pro- <br />perty cleared of all debris, photographs of premises evidencing conditions <br />described, report of Housing Sanitarian of County Department of Public Health <br />and Welfare, concurring in recommendation of Chief Building Inspector, reports <br />of Fire Department, evidence of ownership and other corroborating material. Chief <br />Building Official read his entire report which reviewed the history of vacant <br />buildings on the premises now being handled by the San Mateo County Coroner's <br />Office because of unsuccessful attempts to dispose of property since the death <br />of the owners. <br />Full descriptions of the deficencies were listed according to the State <br />of California Rules and Regulations for Apartment Houses, Hotel and <br />Dwellings. He also reported rehabilitation of the buildings is not <br />economically feasible for correction to comply with even minimum stan- <br />dards and therefore, recommended that the hazardous buildings be demo- <br />lished and property cleared of all debris. It was reported estimated <br />cost for demolition of the structures was approximately $1,200, having <br />been determined by making demolition cost comparisons to other similar <br />structures. (For full text of testimony and evidence submitted see City <br />Cityk's Files - Abatements) <br />Council questioned further details on procedures in this particular <br />instance of property being in an estate and was advised by City Attorney <br />when a property owner doesn't cause abatement, the Building Inspector is <br />authorized to proceed to cause demolition of building and after com- <br />pleted, Council would be asked to approve costs which would then become <br />MIN 19 V <br />