1967 Jan to Dec - Laserfiche WebLink

Browse Search

a lien against the property, and would be placed by the County Tax Collector on the Tax Roll. By this method, the City would be repaid before estate could be settled. Chief Building Official also advised bids would be requested from three con- tractors in order to obtain the lowest cost for the demolition work. City Attorney also explained why completion of demolition procedures would probably take two or three months due to a thirty -day period to give final notice ordering demolition by property owner, or those who might have authority in this instance, and for processing of bids, etc. Councilman Rosselli moved to close the public hearing, seconded by Councilman Keckley and carried. Councilman Petersen moved to adopt RESOLUTION NO. 5390 DECLARING STRUCTURES LOCATED AT 1327 HANCOCK STREET IN THE CITY OF REDWOOD CITY TO BE A PUBLIC NUISANCE, DIREC- TING THE OWNER TO ABATE SAID NUISANCE, AND ORDERING THE EXPENSE OF ABATEMENT TO BE MADE A LIEN UPON THE LAND IN THE EVENT THE NUISANCE IS NOT ABATED BY THE OWNER, seconded by Councilman Rosselli and carried on roll call vote, Mayor Sidney D. Herkner being noted absent. PUBLIC HEARING, Resolution of Intention of the Planning Commission to rezone from R-5 to R-5-0 District, the area on the westerly side of Brewster Avenue between the Pulgas Ranch line and Warren Street, being Lots 7 through 12, Block 7, Range E. Mezesville; Lots 7 through 12, Block 7, Range D, Mezesville, Lots 7 through 12, Block 6, Range C. Mezesville, declared open and affidavits of publication and mailing ordered filed. Report of the Planning Commission read stating a public hearing had been held by the Commission on May 23, 1967, at which time no protests had been received. A motion at the Planning Commission hearing had been made to terminate the proceed- ings on this matter, but had been lost on roll call vote, and motion thereafter passed to recommend to the City Council to rezone from R-5 to R -5-0-A, the area described in their Resolution of Intention, and that the balance of the area be pursued by the Staff for the addition of the A -Combining District in a new appli- cation. Staff report stated this item was originally reviewed on an application for rezoning for a portion of area now being considered, and as applicant subse- quently obtained Power of Attorney from eight other owners of the properties front- ing on Brewster Avenue between Warren St. and the Pulgas Ranch Line authorizing the inclusion of their properties in the applications, and since this left only three owners not included in the applications, the Planning Commission had adopted a Resolution of Intention to consider the rezoning of all lots fronting on Brewster Avenue within this section. It was also stated that this would be the first "0" Combining District in the R-5 District for this area between Whipple Avenue and Brewster Avenue, if adopted; that Brewster Avenue was bordered on the Easterly side by CA zoning district to provide for business and administrative offices not permitted in the PO District or "0" Combining District, the CA zoning in this District having been designed as an 127 MAO @t