1967 Jan to Dec - Laserfiche WebLink

Browse Search

246 application for a, service station if the intention of developing the area as a unit, with a restaurant and motel, were not being fulfilled within a reasonable time, and that, in such event, the Planning Commission would entertain a Resolu- tion of Intention to rezone the property back to its original zone classification." Staff report reviewed the previous requests for rezoning this segment of the property to IR -A which had been denied by the Planning Commission and affirmed by the Council on appeal, it being the intent to withhold the IR zoning to accommo- date a, service station on the portion of this parcel of property until a, motel and/or restaurant were under construction at the corner of Woodside Road and Broadway. It was also stated no development had occurred on this site or other portion of the property after the former zoning consideration and revision, but that applicant still states their intention to develop the service station as previously indicated and that a. lease agreement has been arranged for the restaurant development on the adjacent site, although no use permit has yet been applied for. The Staff recom- mended that this portion of the property be retained as "IP" for industrial park development, or, as an alternate, that, should a motel -restaurant complex be developed on the two segments of land that were rezoned to accommodate them, that the site in question then be considered for change of zoning for such use. There being no communications or oral protests, Councilman Petersen moved to close the public hearing, seconded by Councilman Keckley and carried. Ordinance granting rezoning as requested was read for Council action. No motion was made to introduce the ordinance. Councilman Keckley noted Staff recommendation remained the same for maintaining the IP zoning as in the previous application to rezone this segment of the property involved, until after the restaurant and motel complex were under development, and since no new evidence presented, moved to deny the rezoning requested, seconded by Councilman Rosselli. Councilman Granger sug- gested this public hearing be continued to later in the meeting in the event applicants' appearance ha.d been delayed and they could be given a chance to appear in their own behalf. Council questioned City Clerk as to the notification procedures and assurance was given that applicants had been notified as required. Staff was also questioned as to whether present applicants were the same as in previous action and Planning Director, after checking the application, advised Council that principals appeared to be the same. City Attorney was questioned as to the effect of denial of rezoning requested and when it would be possible for applicants to again institute this action, and advised it would be a full year before rezoning could again be initiated. After further review of the history of this parcel's zoning, motion to deny rezoning carried on roll call vote, Councilmen Granger, Henderson, Keckley, Petersen, and Rosselli voting yes, Councilman Bury and Mayor Herkner voting no. (MINUTE ORDER #67-148) .R io V