Laserfiche WebLink
Robert Rossman, 11 Springdale Way, expressed his similar <br />concern on points raised by Council for amendments proposed <br />on the Planned Development Permits, and questioned reason <br />for omission of Council's voting requirement of a 5/7ths <br />vote of approval of a Permit, as was previously in ordinance <br />and which he felt to be a safeguard. <br />City Attorney explained zoning established type of development required and voting <br />requirement of Council eliminated, as this set controls. Further discussion as to <br />possible meeting with the Planning Commission to discuss this subject, followed. <br />Explanation was made by City Attorney of following procedures which would have to <br />be taken to make this possible: (a) continuing the present public hearing to a speci- <br />fic time and date; (b) terminating proceedings; (c) or closing public hearing. <br />Motion was withdrawn to continue the public hearing. Councilman Rosselli moved to <br />close the public hearing, seconded by Councilman Henderson and carried. (MINUTE <br />ORDER #67-153A) <br />Councilman Rosselli moved to refer this item back to Planning Commission for further <br />study, seconded by Councilman Keckley and carried. (MINUTE ORDER #67-153B) <br />Mayor Herkner asked that City Manager arrange for a Council's joint meeting with <br />the Planning Commission within the next thirty days if possible. (Memo 7/18/67) <br />Report of Transportation Committee (Councilman Petersen, Chairman) <br />Councilman Petersen advised Committee had completed its preliminary study of the <br />feasibility of a subsidized public transportation system for Redwood City derived <br />after months of study, series of visits to Cities in California and voluminous <br />correspondence with other cities throughout the nation experiencing in -City trans- <br />portation problems, and listed the following recommendations: <br />1. That the optimum number of routes for Redwood City is five with the <br />possibility of a sixth cross city route being established as the <br />system proves feasible. <br />2. That the service be on the basis of 6 days per week, 12 hours per <br />day and a 30 minute schedule. <br />3. That the 18 passenger "Mini Bus" type vehicle be utilized. <br />4. That the City urchase six "Mini Bus" type units, at a cost of <br />approximately $14,000 each. Five units would be used on the daily <br />runs with the sixth unit as a standby in the event of mechanical <br />breakdown or involvement in traffic accidents. <br />5. That the City enter into a contract by means of public bid for the <br />operation and maintenance of the rolling stock. <br />6. That all routes with the exception of the cross -city route, which <br />may ultimately be added, originate and terminate at the Franklin <br />Street parking lot. The Committee will continue to study the <br />desirability of constructing a covered waiting area at the Franklin <br />Street lot to provide for passenger comfort during inclement weather. <br />Further details of the Committee findings reported on amount of capital outlay esti- <br />mated at $84,000; recommendation concerning ammortization program, plus a reasonable <br />profit, if to be operated by a, private firm, recommended by the Committee instead of <br />a municipally owned and operated system; decision of Council as to approval of pro- <br />ceeding with bid procedures recommended, if Committee report and recommendations <br />approved. <br />Committee also reported a statement in opposition to the Peninsula Transit Lines <br />request to discontinue bus service in Redwood City, had been filed with the PUC <br />indicating City would require a minimum of 180 days to establish and provide a <br />bus system for the City. <br />151 <br />A17 V <br />