My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
1967 Jan to Dec
RedwoodCity
>
City Clerk
>
Minutes
>
1967
>
1967 Jan to Dec
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/23/2017 2:54:19 PM
Creation date
12/16/2016 3:54:32 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CC Index
CC Index - Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Type
Regular
Agency Type
City Council
Date
1/1/1967
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
456
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
���3iu <br />City Manager was also asked if a different technique could possibly be considered <br />should future bids be even less favorable. City Manager reported on the acute <br />need for sewerage disposal in view of imminent development plans in the project with <br />Marine World and first subdivision improvements, and stated that Jenks & Adamson, <br />original designers of this plan, felt answers would be found as to cause of excesi- <br />sively high bids and corrections could be made. City Manager was also questioned <br />concerning possible use of "package" sewerage plants and stated why this is not <br />recommended as an interim solution. <br />Councilman Rosselli moved to adopt RESOLUTION NO. 5491 REJECTING ALL BIDS RECEIVED <br />FOR CONSTRUCTION OF OXIDATION PONDS FOR REDWOOD CITY GENERAL IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT <br />NO. 1-64; DIRECTING RETURN OF SECURITY DEPOSIT; AND DIRECTING CITY CLERK TO READ- <br />VERTISE FOR BIDS FOR PERFORMANCE OF SAID WORK, seconded by Councilman Henderson and <br />carried on roll call vote. <br />Acceptance of GID 1-64 Projects: <br />(a) Supplemental de -watering, Phase III. Staff report stated Braga.to Paving Co. <br />had completed this contract, and Staff recommended acceptance by the Council with <br />a waiver of the usual 35 -day retention period and authorize payment of the sum with- <br />held for this purpose, ($3,044.16) City Manager advised an administrative error had <br />been made in not requesting acceptance of this project earlier, and since more than <br />the 35 days had passed since project completed, it was felt contractor should be <br />paid sum due. <br />James Reiter, of DMJM, concurred with statement of City Manager <br />concerning the administrative error of not presenting this pro- <br />ject for acceptance earlier as contractor had performed the work <br />satisfactorily and completed 100%. He assured Council new ad- <br />ministrative procedures had been set up to avoid this situation <br />in the future. <br />(b) Primary Fill II, Addition and Surcharge Fill. Staff recommended acceptance <br />of the project as contractor, Piombo Corporation, had completed the project. Coun- <br />cilman Petersen moved to accept the project as recommended by Staff, seconded by <br />Councilman Bury and carried. (MINUTE ORDER #67-191) <br />Councilman Rosselli moved to adopt RESOLUTION NO. 5492 AUTHORIZING TERMINATION OF AGREE- <br />MENT FOR PAYING AGENT SERVICES - WELLS FARGO BANK, seconded by Councilman Keckley.— <br />Staff report stated City's agreement with the bank provides for cancellation on 6 <br />months' written notice from the City, and that it was the Staff's recommendation that <br />since Wells Fargo has served as Paying Agent for Series A and B bond issues for GID <br />1-64, that the agreement be terminated prior to the next bond offering, and deter- <br />mination made as to Paying Agent for Series C at the time the issue is approved. <br />Bond Counsel has been consulted and approves this action. Upon questioning by Coun- <br />cil as to procedures used in determining a choice of a Paying Agent for these ser- <br />vices, City Clerk advised it had been practice previously to request for cost quo- <br />tations of such services from all banks interested in performing such services. In <br />this particular instance the two bids received were identical in costs and Staff had <br />recommended choice of Wells Fargo because of the fact the other bidder was acting <br />as a Paying Agency on another bond issue of the City. Same practice to be followed <br />in the next bond issue and submitted to Council for approval. Motion carried on <br />roll call vote. <br />WY 16 V <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.