Laserfiche WebLink
should also be assured that the 20 channel service was to be anticipated at the <br />present rates proposed to subscribers. <br />Mr. Webber, representing Peninsula Cable Television Corp., advised their appli- <br />cation was submitted in conformity with City Ordinance interpretation but a sub- <br />sequent letter had been submitted covering this point. <br />City Attorney clarified Ordinance enacted by City and rulings since made by FCC <br />setting up priorities which now supersedes City's ordinance. Councilman Granger <br />questioned whether City had right to specify stations desired for CATV system. <br />Mr. Victor E. Sharar, Technical Director, of Peninsula <br />Cable Television Corp., explained Grade A and B contours <br />in San Mateo County and specifically for Redwood City. <br />City Attorney advised his understanding of FCC regulations specified system <br />would first have to carry all local stations as part of 20 channels in Grade A <br />contour and then Grade B contour would automatically be included thereafter, a <br />matter of establishing order of priority. Councilman Henderson asked whether <br />offer covered 20 channels at same price, and what additional charge was made for <br />more than one outlet per residence. <br />Mr. Sharar advised that $1 per month would be added for <br />each additional outlet. <br />Councilman Bury questioned installation charges, and was advised no charge from <br />power line or underground to subscriber vh ichever was available, but not possi- <br />ble to go underground if lines not available as a more costly innovation and <br />could not be done economically. Councilman Rosselli asked for further clari- <br />fication of actual charges to subscribers, and how soon equipment could be <br />installed and ready for operation after granting permit. <br />After further period of questions by Council, Councilman Granger moved that <br />information submitted by applicants be compiled by Staff and returned to <br />Council for a report within thirty days (Feb. 13th) seconded by Councilman Ros- <br />selli and carried. (MINUTE ORDER #67-3) <br />Request of Dr. & Mrs. Wm. Kennett, 100 Arch Street, for variance to the Sidewalk <br />Ordinance to permit installation of concrete paving in parkway presented for <br />consideration. Staff report stated applicant requests permission to install <br />parkway strip paving along Arch Street in front of his medical building, the <br />concrete to have an exposed aggregate finish and interspersed with planting <br />spaces for trees and ground cover, providing better accessibility for people <br />parking along the curb. <br />Staff recommends variance be granted subject to approval of plans prior to con- <br />struction on exposed aggregate finish and tree species. Councilman Rosselli moved <br />to grant variance requested, subject to approval of Staff as recommended, seconded <br />by Councilman Keckley and carried. (MINUTE ORDER #67-4) <br />Mayor called a 10 minute recess, 10:45 p.m. <br />