My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
1968 339- 485 _ 1-8 to 4-15-1968
RedwoodCity
>
City Clerk
>
Minutes
>
1968 partial
>
1968 339- 485 _ 1-8 to 4-15-1968
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/19/2016 3:29:55 PM
Creation date
12/19/2016 1:57:15 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CC Index
CC Index - Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Type
Regular
Agency Type
City Council
Date
1/1/1968
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
161
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
J <br />438 <br />contractor whereby property owners could figure their own costs from their lot <br />sizes or call his Department for assistance and enclosing postcards to be re- <br />turned if work to be performed by them. He advised costs for disking more ex- <br />pensive than that of spraying, but also more effective, and bid submitted <br />covered three disking operations per lot. — <br />In reply to questioning as to any possible hazard which might result should <br />City not provide for a weed abatement program this year, Fire Chief warned <br />elimination of this program would result in fire hazards to home -owners of --ad- <br />jacent property and seriously affect the semi -vacant hill areas if not disked. <br />In reply to questioning of how other cities managed weed abatement, City <br />Manager reported that review by Staff earlier had indicated most cities had <br />a weed abatement program of some sort, such as by contract, their own City <br />forces, abatement work only based on health and safety considerations, with- <br />out a formal program but by notice to property owners with City abating and <br />charging for work if not done by owners. <br />Director of Public Works further reported operational procedures would in - <br />elude an inspector in field with camera to record proof of work done on <br />parcels; costs involved in contract price submitted being for some 800 parcels: <br />with actual cost to each being based on a square footage basis; payment to <br />contractor based on number of diskings to each parcel; costs estimated also <br />would be reduced by those property owners who do their own work. Fire Chief, <br />after further discussion by Council members on possibility of City not enter- <br />ing a weed abatement program, again stressed point that many property owners <br />of vacant land needing weed abatement do not live in Redwood City and delay <br />of program by other procedures would cause hazardous fire conditions later in <br />the season to those property owners living adjacent to these vacant areas. <br />In reply to questioning as to whether City forces could perform this work <br />for the 800 lots to be covered by this program this year, City Manager advised <br />City is not in the position to do this work as proper equipment is lacking. <br />Motion declaring weeds a nuisance and setting public hearing carried on roll <br />call vote, Councilman Keckley being noted absent. <br />Councilman Granger moved that Director of Public Works provide an inspector charged <br />with the task of inspecting each lot before contractor allowed to proceed <br />with disking, seconded by Councilman Petersen and carried. (MINUTE ORDER #68-63) <br />City Manager asked that consideration of the subject concerning the Main Library <br />be continued on the Agenda until Librarian, Architect, and Board members were <br />present. <br />Request for Council's authorization for preparation of plans and specifications <br />for construction of improvements in Andrew Spinas Playground, as recommended <br />by Staff approved on motion of Councilman Rosselli, seconded by Councilman <br />Petersen. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.