Laserfiche WebLink
f <br />discuss modifications. <br />Robert Frank, Attorney representing certain downtown mer- <br />chants named on a list he submitted to Council, stated mer- <br />chants had requested that traffic study program be sus- <br />pended in its entirety, if possible, or alternatives be <br />considered. <br />City Manager reviewed report submitted to Council containing requests which had been -. <br />originally made by the merchant group for modification of the curb width of Broadway <br />to permit installation of channelization to provide for left turn storage and dia- <br />gonal rather than parallel parking and the resultant investigation of Staff on costs, <br />feasibility, and further proposed subsequently suggested by Staff for providing left <br />turn channelization without expense of physically widening Broadway. He advised <br />this concept would retain parallel parking, one traffic lane in each direction and <br />channelization providing left turn slots at estimated cost of $9,000. He advised <br />recommendation originally made by merchants for the diagonal parking would not pro- <br />vide more parking spaces than now present and referred to other substantial pro- <br />blems. <br />He stated Staff's recommendation at this point, and which had been presented to <br />representatives of merchants' group, would be to abandon Stage 5, commence Stage <br />6 with modifications to allow parallel parking on both sides of Broadway and Cen- <br />tral storage area, permit two lanes of moving traffic in each direction from E1 <br />Camino to railroad tracks, and balance of Broadway one lane in each direction, and <br />thereafter commencing Stage 7 phase. He stated this last phase most closely <br />followed the Downtown Plan as prepared by Blaney and Livingston. He also stated <br />it was felt that these final phases would indicate early in their operation whether <br />problems were being created which would reflect on the validity of the downtown <br />plan. <br />City Manager also advised plans were nearly completed for utility improvements in <br />downtown area under the approved city-wide bond issue and construction program <br />scheduled to begin for early April which too, reflected on the timing of the traffic <br />study program. <br />Upon questioning by Council for further clarification on phases of program under <br />Stage VI, Chief of Police further reviewed proposal as follows: Spring to rail- <br />road track, a pair of one-way stredts; East bound on Broadway -West on Marshall; <br />E1 Camino to railroad tracks -two lanes of traffic in each direction. Another pair <br />of one-way streets proposed for Middlefield and Jefferson from intersection of <br />Jefferson do Middlefield to Veterans Blvd. He advised this phase was proposed for <br />approximately 6 weeks, but allowances would be made for adjustment by'citizens <br />before violations cited. He also noted fact that thereafter Stage 7 most closely <br />resembled plan downtown merchants approved, with exception of the diagonal parking. <br />Police Chief also expressed his opinion that Redwood City had not benefitted from <br />this study program as survey basically designed for purpose of aiding other cities <br />with the statistical data derived therefrom, Stage 5 containing the unbalanced flow <br />of traffic, of little value, and left turn prohibitions already having been proven <br />not beneficial to the City. Councilman Granger asked that street lines be repainted <br />to cover the ones made during program as lines now result in confusion. (Memo 1/9/68) <br />0 s'* <br />