Laserfiche WebLink
418 <br />Councilman Keckley moved to adopt RESOLUTION NO. 5621 AMENDING RESOLUTION NO. 5499, <br />ADOPTED SEPTEMBER 25, 1967, AUTHORIZING PROCEEDINGS IN EMINENT DOMAIN FOR <br />WATERWAY AND RELATED IMPROVEMENTS, seconded by Councilman Petersen. <br />Staff report stated this amended resolution added two additional parcels required <br />for completion of construction for Dredge "B" water -way improvements, GID 1-64. <br />Acting City Attorney advised proposed Dredge "B" waterway improvements are in <br />fact a continuation of the work being done by Dredge "A". He depicted areas <br />already under possession by the City and where the parcels now being proposed <br />were located. <br />Councilman Henderson requested that the record indicate she had discussed <br />this proposed action with both theCity Manager and Acting City Attorney and <br />would not participate in any further discussion at this point. Motion carried <br />on roll call vote, Councilman Henderson voting no. <br />Councilman Granger moved to adopt RESOLUTION NO. 5622 APPROVING PLANS AND SPECI- <br />FICATIONS FOR RECLAMATION AND DRAINAGE PROJECT, DREDGE EXTERIOR WATERWAYS -2, <br />FOR REDWOOD CITY GENERAL IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT NO. 1-64; AND, AUTHORIZING CITY <br />CLERK TO CALL FOR BIDS THEREFOR', seconded by Councilman Keckley. Staff report <br />stated a portion of the construction provided for by these documents is in -- <br />eluded in the area to be condemned. Motion carried on roll call vote, Council- <br />man Henderson voting no. <br />Discussion of recommended Civic Center Site. Council briefly considered this matter <br />at the meeting of February 19th and continued discussion to this meeting in <br />order a full Council could be present for presentatinn by the City Manager of <br />proposed site plan and other material requested. Councilman Rosselli ex- <br />pressed disapproval of the plan for a civic center site as calling for minimum <br />space requirements not long range plans; present site had highest acquistion <br />costs, and fact that besides present site being recommended by EBS, same report <br />also had recommended revitalization by establishment of a department store, <br />which he didn't deem possible. <br />He again stressed point that had also been discussed by Council of Mayors and <br />LAFC at a recent meeting indicating a consolidation of cities was possibility <br />for the future and site selection, therefore, should be reviewed thoroughly, <br />with alternate sites being particularly reviewed that might have more advantages <br />for long range planning. <br />City Manager stated he would welcome an opportunity to preview for Council <br />the sites contained in the EBS report and justify recommendation made that <br />the new civic center be located in an expansion of the present site. He <br />agreed a drastic error would be committed if only minimal site requirements <br />were acquired for a civic center with the potential growth of the area so <br />eminently apparent at this time, but felt that by utilizing "air rights" <br />over the existing Parking District property at the present site, acquisition <br />is 26'86 <br />