My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
Reso PC16-23 PC 0116 Reso CEQA - Sandpiper
RedwoodCity
>
City Clerk
>
Resolutions
>
Planning Commission
>
2016
>
Reso PC16-23 PC 0116 Reso CEQA - Sandpiper
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/3/2017 1:00:25 PM
Creation date
1/3/2017 12:05:46 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CC Index
CC Index - Document Type
Resolution
Meeting Type
Regular
Agency Type
Planning Commission
Date
12/6/2016
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
139
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Section 4.0—Environmental Setting and Discussion of Impacts <br />accordance with the 2013 California Building Code (CBC), which contains the regulations that <br />govern the construction of structures in California. Adherence to the 2013 CBC would increase the <br />likelihood of the project to resist minor earthquakes without damage and major earthquakes without <br />collapse. <br />In addition, the design -level drawings and all accompanying documentation, including all structural <br />elements of the proposed classroom building would be subject to the City and the Department of the <br />State Architect (DSA) review and approval process. The primary role of the DSA is to ensure that <br />California's K-12 schools and cominunity colleges are seismically safe and accessible to all. DSA <br />fulfills this role by reviewing construction plans for structural safety, fire and life safety, and ADA <br />compliance. In this role, DSA works closely with school districts and designers. <br />The proposed project would not exacerbate existing seismicity and seismic hazards on the project site <br />and, therefore, would not result in an impact under CEQA. (No Impact) <br />4.6.3.2 Soils Impacts (Checklist Question 4) <br />The project site is land reclaimed from the San Francisco Bay. The site consists of five to eight feet <br />of engineered fill soils placed on the native bay mud materials. The fill soils that blanket the site <br />have a relatively low expansion potential. As discussed in the Geotechnical Engineering <br />Investigation and Geologic and Seismic Hazards Assessment, the fill on the project site is underlain <br />by approximately 40 feet of saturated and soft bay mud sediments that continue to settle under the <br />weight of the existing fill and structures on the site. The weight from the placement of additional fill <br />and/or structures on the project site would result in increased settlement. If fill and/or structures are <br />not sufficiently distributed across the site, differential settlement could occur at the site. <br />Impact GEO-1: Development of the proposed project could result in increased differential <br />settlement on the project site. <br />Mititsation Measure: The following mitigation measure would be implemented to reduce the <br />potential for increased differential settlement to occur on the project site to a less than significant <br />level. <br />MM GEO-1: The proposed project would be designed and constructed using standard <br />engineering safety techniques and would implement all the recommendations <br />identified in the design -specific geotechnical report prepared for the project in <br />accordance with the 2013 CBC and other state regulations. The design - <br />specific geotechnical report, along with the design -level drawings, would be <br />subject to the City and the DSA review and approval process. <br />With implementation of the mitigation measure identified above, the proposed project would not <br />result in a significant differential settlement impact. (Less Than Significant Impact with <br />Mitigation Incorporated) <br />City of Redwood City 43 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration <br />Sandpiper Elementary School Facilities Expansion November 2016 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.