My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
AgdaPkt 2017-01-09 Closed and Joint
RedwoodCity
>
City Clerk
>
Agenda Packets
>
2010-2019
>
2017
>
AgdaPkt 2017-01-09 Closed and Joint
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/24/2017 7:40:57 AM
Creation date
1/5/2017 6:17:20 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CC Index
CC Index - Document Type
Agenda Packet
Meeting Type
Joint
Agency Type
City Council and Successor Agency and Public Financing Authority
Date
1/9/2017
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
608
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
7.A. - Page 2 <br />The City had complied with CEQA and that the proposed Project was consistent <br />with the DTPP and the DTPP EIR, including its applicable mitigation measures <br />and Statement of Overriding Considerations. The Initial Study concluded no <br />further environmental review was required; <br />The proposed project would not result in any new environmental effects, <br />substantially increase the severity of any impact, or require any new mitigation <br />measures; <br />The proposed project was consistent with the Downtown Planned Community <br />Permit, Tentative Map, Condominium Permit, and Planned Development Permit <br />findings. <br />Following the Planning Commission's approval, two parties appealed the decision. On <br />July 25, 2016, after a duly noticed public hearing, the City Council adopted Resolution <br />15515 denying the appeal and approving the Project having independently heard, <br />considered, and weighed all the evidence in the record. <br />A lawsuit was subsequently filed in San Mateo County Superior Court by an association <br />of persons called "Redwood City Residents for Responsible Development" (RCRFRD), <br />challenging the validity of the City's actions to approve the Project. The Petitioner in the <br />lawsuit is RCRFRD, the City is the defendant, and the Applicant is a Real Party in <br />Interest. <br />Pursuant to the Settlement Agreement that was entered into between RCRFRD, the <br />City, and JEFFRES on November 17, 2016, the Applicant JEFFRES agreed with <br />RCRFRD to submit a Revised Project to the City, and the City agreed to consider the <br />Revised Project at a duly noticed public hearing. The Revised Project that is described <br />in the Settlement Agreement is now before the City Council for consideration and <br />action. The Revised Project has fewer units and is lower in height than the Project <br />approved by the City Council on July 25, 2016 (by Resolution 15515), as is discussed <br />below. <br />ANALYSIS <br />The Revised Proiect consists of a Downtown Planned Community Permit, Tentative <br />Map, Condominium Permit, and Planned Development Permit to develop a 6 -story <br />building with 4,500 square feet of ground floor retail space, and 68 residential <br />condominiums on floors 2 through 6 (the "Revised Project"). The Revised Project <br />includes a request for the same five Guideline deviations as previously requested in the <br />Project. <br />The differences between the Project and the Revised Project are as follows: <br />Feature I Original Project I Revised Project <br />Stories <br />Eight Six <br />Height 92 -feet 77 -feet, 3 -inches (+/- 6") <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.