Laserfiche WebLink
7.A. - Page 6 <br />The intersections at Jefferson/Marshall and Main/Marshall exhibited higher AM <br />and PM peak hour volumes than the 2010 Existing Conditions; however, both <br />intersections function at a LOS B or C, which is considered an acceptable level of <br />service. <br />All of the 2016 intersection counts are below the 2030 Cumulative scenario <br />analyzed in the DTPP EIR. <br />Staff concludes that the Revised Project, containing 23 fewer dwelling units, would not <br />generate any new impacts not previously identified, and would generate fewer trips than <br />the originally -approved Project. <br />Tentative Map, Condominium Permit, Planned Development Permit <br />The findings for approval of the Tentative Map, Condominium Permit, and Planned <br />Development Permit for the Revised Project would remain unchanged from the original <br />Project, with minor edits to reflect the Revised Project at 68 units. <br />ALTERNATIVES <br />Council may consider alternatives to the Staff Recommendation. <br />1. Deny the "Revised Project" Downtown Planned Community Permit, Tentative <br />Map, Planned Development Permit, and Condominium Permit, and provide <br />appropriate findings for denial, which would leave the original Project approval in <br />place (as approved by City Council Resolution 15515), and cause the litigation to <br />continue. <br />2. Continue the hearing and direct Staff or the Applicant to return with additional <br />information/analysis. <br />FISCAL IMPACT <br />Review of the Revised Project is subject to the City's Cost Recovery System, and <br />therefore direct costs during the entitlement process associated with staff and <br />consultant time are covered by an applicant deposit. <br />ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW <br />In 2010, an Environmental Impact Report (State Clearinghouse #2006052027) was <br />prepared to assess potential impacts resulting from the implementation of the DTPP. <br />The DTPP established new land use, development, and urban design regulations for <br />the 183 -acre DTPP area, including the potential for up to 2,500 net new dwelling units, <br />and 100,000 net new square feet of retail development. The DTPP Environmental <br />Impact Report (EIR) was certified by the City Council on January 24, 2011. <br />Council's adoption of Resolution 15515 that denied the Project appeal and approved the <br />Project entitlements included findings that the Project would not result in any new <br />environmental impacts or substantial increase in the severity of any environmental <br />impact beyond those previously identified in the DTPP program EIR. Nor would the <br />Project require new mitigation measures beyond those identified in the DTPP program <br />