Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Name of Bidder Unit Cost per <br />Vehicle <br />Total for all 9 <br />Vehicles <br /> <br />Towne Ford <br />(Redwood City, CA) <br /> $36,442.00 <br /> <br />$327,978.00 <br /> <br /> <br />Downtown Ford <br />(Sacramento, CA) <br /> <br /> <br /> $37,397.44 <br /> <br />$336,576.96 <br /> <br />Hansel Ford <br />(Santa Rosa, CA) <br /> <br /> $39,196.00 $352,764.00 <br /> Ford Lincoln Fairfield <br />(Fairfield, CA) <br /> <br /> $42,642.00 <br /> <br />$383,778.00 <br /> <br />Recommended Bidder: Towne Ford <br /> <br />Substantiation: Towne Ford is the lowest responsible bidder. <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />The recommended action is to award the bid to Towne Ford because they are the <br />lowest responsible bidder to meet the vehicle requirements in the bid specifications. <br />Towne Ford’s bid did contain one minor irregularity. The Notice Inviting Sealed Bids <br />requested bidders to sign and date the Specification Sheet. Towne Ford signed, but did <br />not date, the Specification Sheet. Staff recommends that the City Council waive this <br />minor irregularity and accept Towne Ford’s bid as the irregularity was not the result of <br />fraudulent intent on the part of the bidder and the best interests of the public would be <br />served by such waiver. This decision is authorized by the Notice Inviting Sealed Bids <br />and Section 2.68(C) of the Purchasing Ordinance. The Notice Inviting Sealed Bids <br />states: <br /> <br />The right is reserved, as the interest of the City may require, to purchase <br />individual equipment, materials, vehicles or supplies from more than one <br />Bidder or all equipment, materials, vehicles or supplies from one Bidder, to <br />reject any or all bids, to waive any informality in bids, and to accept, <br />modify, or reject any items of the bid. <br /> <br />Section 2.68(C) of the Purchasing Ordinance states: <br /> <br />“The Council may waive any irregularities in bids received or permit the <br />correction of erroneous bids when the Council finds that the irregularity or <br />error was not the result of fraudulent intent on the part of the bidder and <br />that the best interests of the public would be served thereby.” <br />6.1.I. - Page 2