My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
Reso PC17-07 0032 PC Reso Approving CEQA - 860 Charter St
RedwoodCity
>
City Clerk
>
Resolutions
>
Planning Commission
>
2017
>
Reso PC17-07 0032 PC Reso Approving CEQA - 860 Charter St
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/28/2017 4:18:31 PM
Creation date
6/28/2017 4:06:28 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CC Index
CC Index - Document Type
Resolution
Meeting Type
Regular
Agency Type
Planning Commission
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
137
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
LSA ASSOCIATES, INC. <br />SEPTEMBER 2016 <br />ROCKETSHIP REDWOOD CITY ELEMENTARY SCHOOL PROJECT <br />INITIAL STUDY/ MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION <br /> <br /> <br />P:\RWC1401B Rocketship School\PRODUCTS\IS-MND\Public\Rocketship Public Review 09-29-16.docx (09/29/16) PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT 31 <br />The incremental daily emission increase in <br />reactive organic gases (ROG) and nitrogen <br />oxides (NOx) (two precursors of ozone) and <br />particulate matter (PM10 and PM2.5) associ- <br />ated with buildout of the proposed project are <br />identified in Table 2. The BAAQMD has <br />established thresholds of significance for <br />ozone precursors and PM2.5 of 54 pounds per <br />day, and a threshold of 82 pounds per day for <br />PM10. As shown in Table 2, emissions from <br />the project would not exceed these thresholds <br />of significance; the impacts to air quality <br />from criteria air pollutant and precursor <br />emissions related to project operations would <br />be less than significant. The proposed project <br />would not violate any air quality standard or <br />contribute substantially to an existing or <br />projected air quality violation. <br /> <br />The emission estimates above do not include <br />potential soil vapor emissions, which are <br />existing and would not be exacerbated by <br />this project. As described in Chapter I, Project Description, the project includes operation of a passive <br />sub-slab depressurization system which is designed such that VOCs would be captured and <br />discharged to ambient outdoor air. In the event that indoor air sampling and sub-slab monitoring <br />indicates that the passive system is not effective (i.e., indoor air concentrations of VOCs exceed <br />acceptable levels), the system would be converted to an active system. The difference between the <br />passive and active systems is that an active system would involve installation of exhaust fans to force <br />the vapors out through the existing sub-slab depressurization system. This active air flow would <br />expand the capture area of the sub-slab perforated pipes. The active system would involve the <br />installation and continuous operation of 120 volt exhaust fans at each of four roof vent locations. <br /> <br />The emissions associated with the soil vapor extraction may require a permit to operate by the <br />BAAQMD. The project applicant will consult the BAAQMD Permit Handbook and Air District staff <br />to determine disclosure requirements and applicable fees. Best Available Control Technology would <br />be implemented as required for permitting under BAAQMD rules and regulations. <br /> <br />c) Result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of any criteria pollutant for which the project <br />region is non-attainment under an applicable federal or State ambient air quality standard <br />(including releasing emissions which exceed quantitative thresholds for ozone precursors)? <br />(Less-Than-Significant Impact) <br /> <br />CEQA defines a cumulative impact as two or more individual effects, which when considered <br />together, are considerable or which compound or increase other environmental impacts. According to <br />the BAAQMD, air pollution is largely a cumulative impact. No single project is sufficient in size, by <br />itself, to result in non-attainment of ambient air quality standards. Instead, a project’s individual <br />emissions contribute to existing cumulatively significant adverse air quality impacts. Therefore, if <br />daily average or annual emissions of operational-related criteria air pollutants exceed any applicable <br />Table 2: Project Regional Emissions <br />Emissions in Pounds Per Day <br /> <br />Reactive <br />Organic <br />Gases <br />Nitrogen <br />Oxides PM10 PM2.5 <br />Project <br />Emissions 4.3 6.8 3.7 1.1 <br />BAAQMD <br />Standard 54.0 54.0 82.0 54.0 <br />Exceed?No No No No <br />Emissions in Tons Per Year <br />Project <br />Emissions 0.6 0.9 0.5 0.1 <br />BAAQMD <br />Standard 10.0 10.0 15.0 10.0 <br />Exceed?No No No No <br />Note: Regional project emissions were calculated with an <br />assumed student enrollment of 600. The project has <br />since been revised to reduce the maximum <br />enrollment capacity to 480 students. Therefore, the <br />calculations overestimate project emissions <br />associated with vehicle trips and the data presented <br />above is a conservative estimate. <br />Source: LSA Associates, Inc., 2014. <br /> <br />ATTY/RESO.0032/PC RESO APPROVING CEQA - 860 CHARTER ST. EXHIBIT A <br />REV: 06-15-17 PR <br />Page 39 of 124
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.