Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES OF REGULAR MEETING <br />REIVOOD CITY COUNCIL <br />AUGUST 18, 1930 <br />S P.M. <br />Upon roll Call, the following Were present: Councilmen Mayor D R Stafford, H A Beeger, <br />W J Dusel, C J Hildebrant, P A McCarthy, G W McNulty, and City Clerk B E Myers, <br />Absent: E. B. Hinman. <br />Upon motion of Councilman Beeger, seconded by Councilman Dusel minutes as mailed Were <br />approved. <br />Dave L Walter asked permission of the Council to rearrange the two lots at the corner <br />of Edgeerood Road and Oakdale to make them face on Edgewood rather than Oakdale. <br />R L Bremner, Who had filed a formal protest, also made oral protest to creating <br />a key lot of his property. A letter was also read from Mrs G S Rice Who lives <br />across the street. After discussion, upon motion by Councilman McCarthy, seconded <br />by Counoilman Beeger, the application Was denied subject to the right of renewal <br />provided Mr Walter could obtain the consent of the protesting property owner. <br />The Clerk was asked to read a letter, <br />addressed to the <br />Building <br />Inspector, from the <br />Sudden Lumber Company applying for <br />permit to erect <br />'certain <br />improvements" in <br />accordance with plans submitted. A protest to this permit was filed and <br />several supplemented the protest orally among whom were William Hohn, Chas. H. <br />Holt, Rev. Cavanaugh, and Fire Chief Mark Ryan who in answer to questions pro- <br />pounded to him by Councilman McCarthy indicated that a lumber yard there would <br />be a fire hazard. Councilman Beeger expressed his opinion that a lumber yard <br />there would greatly detract from the value of property in that block,and <br />Councilman Dusel spoke for Ve Baird a property owner in that vicinity. Finally <br />Upon motion of Councilman YOUlty, seconded by Councilman Hildebrant, the matter <br />was referred to the Building Inspector to examine the plans and to make his <br />recommendation as to what should be done to make them conform to the ordinance <br />applying thereto. <br />Mr. Ed. Scott, who stated he was representing certain property owners affected, <br />precipitatgd the discussion concerning the elsotrolier lighting system on <br />Broadway and Hopkins. Mr. Scott made the contention that according to the <br />law applying, any and all protests should have been in writing and presented <br />before eight o'clock on the night set for hearing and that any protests either <br />written or oral thereafter would have no legal •eight whatsoever. Mr. A. Hess, <br />Sr., who had circulated a protest petition, outlined his stand on the question, <br />and he in turn was followed by Councilman McCarthy who emphasized the points <br />made by Mr. Scott and submitted figures from the Engineer's Office showing total <br />frontage and percentages of signatures on original petition and the protest <br />petition. Counoilmsn Beeger spoke briefly on the matter as did B E Myers, who <br />represented the Methodist Church. D L Walter also spoke. Finally, Councilman <br />McCarthy, seconded by Councilman Hildebrant, offered Resolution over -ruling <br />proteats,and moved its adoption, Upon Roll Call, Councilmen Hildebrant, McCarthy <br />and Stafford voted "Yes" and Councilmen Beeger, Dusel and McNulty, voted "No" <br />0 <br />Ur- <br />