Laserfiche WebLink
439 <br />t <br />Councilman McNulty, seconded by Councilman Lambert, offered the following resolution con— <br />firming street assessment No. N-2 (Extension of Main Streot). In connection with this, <br />j The City Attorney explained that certain claims had)been filed against W.O. Tyson; the <br />contractor, but that in order to release the assessment Mr. Tyson had furnished a bond <br />} in the sum of $400 and in his (the attorney) opinion it would be proper to confirm <br />' the assessment that Mr. Tyson might get the money. <br />i <br />� k RESOLUTION CONFIRMING STREET ASSESSMENT N0._N-2 <br />WHEREAS, the assessment for street work done under that certain <br />contract dated the 2nd day of May, 1931, between W.O. TYSON, the party <br />of the first part, and C.L. DIMMITT, as Superintendent of Streets of . <br />the City of Redwood City, party of the second -part, for the doing of <br />all street work mentioned and described in Resolution of Intention No. <br />N-2, passed and adopted by the Council of the City of Redwood City on <br />1 the 16th day of L4arch, 1931, and now on file in the office of the Clerk <br />of said city, to which Resolution of Intention reference is hereby made <br />�{ for a description of said work, waa filed in the office of the Clerk of <br />�! said City of Redwood City on the 2nd day of November, 1931; and <br />WRERRAS, said City Clerk did thereupon fix Monday, the 7th day <br />of December, 1931, at the hour of 7:30 o'clock p.m. of said day, at the <br />meeting place of the Council of the City of Redwood City, in the Coun— <br />cil Chamber in the City Hall on Middlefield Road in said city, as the <br />time and place of hearing on said assessment, as required by law, and <br />as the time and place for making written objections thereto, as provided <br />for in the Improvement Act of 1911; and <br />WHEREAS, notice of the filing of said assessment and of the <br />time fixed for hearing thereon was duly given by posting, publishing and <br />mailing,'as required by law, as appears from the affidavits of B.E. MYERS <br />and D. HEYDBNFELDT, now on file in the office of the Clerk of said City <br />of Redwood City; and <br />WHEREAS, at the time and place last herein metitioned, no objec- <br />tions of any kind were made against said assessment; and <br />WHEREAS, said Council of the City of Redwood City has now acquired <br />jurisdiction thereon; <br />TAERF.FORr BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of Redwood <br />City, County of San Mateo; State of California, that the assessment <br />i <br />above mentioned for street work d one under Resolution of Intention No. <br />N-2 hereinbefore referred to herein be and the same is hereby aprroved <br />r <br />and adopted, and the Superintendent of Streets of said City of Redwood <br />llI <br />City is hereby directed to attach a warrant thereto and deliver same to <br />I; M, <br />the contractor, as required by law. <br />Passed and adopted by the Council of the City of Redwood City at <br />a regular meeting thereof held on the 7th day of December, 1931, by the <br />followingvote: <br />4 <br />Ayes and in favor of the passage of'the foregoing resolution, <br />k' <br />Councilmen: H A TREGER, 59 J DUSEL, C J HILDEBRANT, C G LAMBERT', P A MC CARTYY, <br />f <br />G E MC NULTY, D R STAFFORD. <br />Noes and against the passage of the foregoing resolution, <br />[ <br />Councilmen: None. <br />Absent: Councilmen None. <br />fk <br />DANIEL R STAFFORD <br />Mayor of the City of Redwood City <br />f!� <br />Attest: <br />B E MYERS <br />I <br />Clerk of the City of Redwood Cit, <br />I' <br />I hereby approve the foregoing resolution this 7th day of December, 1931. <br />DANIEL R STAFF ORD <br />Mayor of the City of Redwood City <br />l t <br />it} <br />Affidavits of the publishing, posting and mailing of notice of filing street assessment <br />LIN <br />uI G <br />and the time fixed for hearing for the extension of Main Street under Resolutinn <br />7 <br />C� I <br />of Intention No. N-2 were ordered filed, on motion of Councilman Beeger, seconded <br />Yti <br />by Councilman McCarthy. <br />