Laserfiche WebLink
' <br />I <br />i <br />I <br />MINUTES OF REGULAR MEETING <br />REDWOOD CITY COUNCIL <br />AUGUST 15, 1932 <br />5:00 P.M. <br />Upon roll call, the following Councilmen were present: Mayor W. J. Dusel, H. A. Beeger, R. N. Jones <br />C. G. Lambert, Paul A. McCarthy,'Geo. W. McNulty, City Clerk, B. E. Akers. Absent: Councilman <br />C. J. Hildebrant. <br />Minutes of August 1st and Sth were approved on motion of Councilman McCarthy, seconded by Councilman <br />Lambert. <br />The City Engineer made a report, with sketch, of the proposed change of gutter and curb at the corner <br />of Myrtle and Katherine Streets, indicating that the owner of the property, the Redwood Highlands <br />Company, would be willing to deed to the City the small portion necessary for this construction. <br />The matter was referred to the City Attorney to follow up. <br />The Railroad Commission addressed a letter to the City Manager and Council concerning the installation <br />of a mechanical signal on the Southern Pacific Tracks where they cross Spruce Street, for the <br />purpose of having this installation serve as a test, with the idea, perhaps, of using automatic <br />signals at all crossings in Redwood City. The matter was referred by the Mayor to the'City <br />Manager, City Engineer and Councilman Beeger with the request to make their recommendation at <br />the next meeting. The Clerk was also asked to notify the Railroad Commission that the matter <br />was having attention. <br />The City Assessor asked the Council concerning the delivery of deeds in connection with the Hudson <br />Street opening Down as Resolution M-5, indicating that she wished to assess certain parcels <br />with the understanding that deeds had been delivered. On motion of Councilman McCarthy, seconded <br />by Councilman Jones, she was so instructed, that is, to assess the property in question as if <br />the deeds had already been delivered. <br />Walter Conant, of 728 Vera Avenue, requested that the license charge for peddlers be waived in his <br />instance as he was unable to pay it and it would materially aid him in making a living. The <br />Council did not grant his request. <br />Mrs. Emma Eads (Becker) made a special request that the improvements on her property be reduced from the <br />$450 set by the City Assessor. It was finally decided that the valuation of the improvements <br />be reduced to $300. <br />At this time the City Manager addressed the Council concerning his recommendation in regard to <br />salary reductions, referring to a report which had been mailed to each of the Councilmen. <br />After considerable discussion, the matter was brought before the Council for decision, by <br />1 <br />motion of Councilman Beeger, seconded by Councilman McCarthy. Councilman Beeger moved that <br />the Council accept the recommendation of the City Manager as the salary schedule and the <br />Allocation of salaries to different funds with the understanding that there would be a volun- <br />tary agreement on the part of the employees to accept this reduction in compensation effective <br />August 1, 1932 to June 30, 1933. Motion carried.(Schedule on file) <br />The City Attorney addressed the Council concerning his salary and it was finally decided, on motion <br />of Councilman Jones, seconded by Councilman McNulty, that the City Attorney be paid $250 per <br />month with no allowance for stenographic help or rent. <br />