My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
BOOK 17_1933-01-03 to 1938-12-29
RedwoodCity
>
City Clerk
>
Minutes
>
1933 to 1938 Book 17
>
BOOK 17_1933-01-03 to 1938-12-29
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/12/2017 10:49:11 AM
Creation date
10/12/2017 10:28:33 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CC Index
CC Index - Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Type
Regular
Agency Type
City Council
Date
1/3/1933
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
563
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
1.78 <br />9 <br />agreed to pay one-half of the expense so entailed, with a similar proposal for Main <br />Street. After discussion, it was decided, on motion of Councilman McCarthy, seconded <br />by Councilman Fletcher, that the City Clerk write Mr. Mercier as follows: (1) That <br />the City did not desire to assume any responsibility for placing policemen at rail- <br />road crossings. (2) That the Southern Pacific Company equip flagmen at Broadway and <br />Main Street crossings with some distinctive suit affording such a contrast as to be <br />easily distinguishable especially at night, and (3) That the Southern Pacific Company <br />establish at its own expense on both sides of the track at the Broadway crossing, a <br />-regular "Stop" and "Go" traffic signal, to be manually operated by the flagman on duty. <br />John'Volpiano, Secretary of the Peninsular Fire Chiefst Club, asked the Council, in a letter <br />addressed to Chief Mark Ryan, to adopt an ordinance covering the discharge, possession <br />and selling of fireworks within the City. Chief Ryan explained that Redwood City <br />already had an ordinance which was more comprehensive than the one submitted, and <br />thought it unnecessary to make any change. The Clerk was therefore asked to notify <br />Mr. Volpiano accordingly. <br />Councilman Fletcher, seconded by Councilman McCarthy, proposed the adoption of the follow- <br />ing resolution which was unanimously carried. <br />BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Redwood City, <br />California,.that for and on behalf of the Citizens of Redwood <br />City, it is definitely opposed to the repeal .of the sAllin <br />Amendments which is now a part of the Intercoastal Shipping <br />Act. <br />AND.BE IT_FURTRER RESOLVED, that this City Council <br />urges that an amendment with the purpose and effect of the ll4iii <br />sAllin Amendments be enacted as a part of any Subsidy Bill <br />now under consideration of the Congress of the United States, <br />which shall bar the subsidizing of any carrier or a member -of <br />a °conferences or Association of carriers which either pre- <br />vents or attempts to prevent a member carrier from serving <br />any American port. <br />AND BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that copies of this <br />Resolution be sent to our Congressmen and Senators with the <br />request that they prevent the repeal of the sAllin Amendments <br />in present law and.urge its enactment in any subsequent sub- <br />sidy legislation. <br />The,City Treasurer asked whether or not the Council cared to take out any insurance to <br />protect the City checks in addition to the present use of a special check writer. <br />He was told it was thought unnecessary at the present time. <br />Councilman Eva suggested that the Council should anticipate the work necessary to the pre- <br />paration of data pertaining to delinquent 1915 Act assessments if and when the <br />refunding bond issue should be ready, and proposed that the Mayor appoint a committee <br />to take charge of the formulation of appropriate procedure. Following the line of <br />discussion, Mayor Lambert appointed as a committee to work out details, Councilmen <br />Eva, Christensen and McCarthy to work with the Mayor, including also the City <br />Attorney and City Manager. <br />;I <br />The City Attorney reported concerning the hearing before the Railroad Commission in connec- <br />tion with the P.G.& E. application and told the Council the. matter had been continued <br />,: <br />for another hearing on March 10. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.