Laserfiche WebLink
4Lrz <br />"Mayor Christensen and City Manager Dimmitt recommended that <br />the sum of $228.92 be accepted in settlement of the charges <br />on the following property instead of $311.59 actually due if <br />the total amount was paid in full. .The property referred to <br />is Arbitrary Block 270, Lot 4B or legal description, Lot 3 <br />Block B, Boyd and Kent Addition assessed in the name of North- <br />ern California Congregational Church. <br />Delinquent Taxes <br />Delinquent Bond'K-4 <br />Tax Penalty <br />Bond Penalty <br />$ 22.30 <br />210.59 <br />22.02 <br />56.69 $311.59 <br />This tax has been paid in installments and the final payment <br />has been made. Will you please confirm the above authori- <br />zation?" <br />Authorization was given on,motion of Councilman McCarthy, seconded by Councilman <br />McNulty. <br />The President of the Chamber of Commerce in a letter to the Council indicated that it <br />was the consensus of opinion that the Tabernacle now located at the corner of El <br />Camino RebLl and James Avenue was detrimental to the best interests of Redwood City, <br />and he asked that the Council deny any request for extension of time. On motion <br />of Councilman Anderson, seconded by Councilman Fletcher, the Clerk was asked to <br />write a letter to the management of the Tabernacle, indicating that there was <br />criticism of the building being located at that place -and that it was the desire <br />of the Council that the building be removed on or before the date originally <br />agreed upon. <br />The Clerk was instructed to bring'up at the first meeting in January the following: <br />butloIng at corner of E1 Camino and Harrison, building at the corner of Bradford <br />and Middlefield, building at 235 Pennsylvania Avenue, Hillview Avenue 1911 Act <br />Bond Resolution. <br />On motion of Councilman Fletcher,, seconded by Councilman McNulty, the City Clerk was <br />directed to write a letter to the owner of Lot 5, Block 2, Dingee Park, to ask <br />him to improve the appearance of the lot. <br />At this meeting there was again brought up for discussion the question of what to do <br />about real estate signs. The Clerk had requested Mrs."Dusel and Mr. Marlow to <br />appear in an effort to get them to cooperate with the other realtors. Several <br />real estate agents were present and entered into a discussion, and a letter from <br />Mrs. Dasel was read. The prevailing theme was that all signs should be <br />eliminated, if any were. After much discussion, Councilman McCarthy, seconded <br />by Councilman Pletcher, proposed that the City Attorney draw up a tentative <br />ordinance similar to the one already introduced before the Council at San Carlos <br />with copies being furnished to Councilmen and interested real estate brokers. <br />Councilman McCarthy, seconded by Councilman McNulty, proposed the final passage of <br />Ordinance No. 419 regulating bicycle traffic. Carried. <br />0 <br />