BOOK 19_1942-09-08 to 1945-05-07

Browse Search

C' 0 p t City Attorney McCarthy, as a member of the Planning Commission, amplified this letter stating that two proposed ordinance changes had been brought before the Commission, one prepared by Attorney 0, F. Nuckolls and one prepared by Mr. .McCarthy. Commissioner Ronald L. Campbell stated at the Commission meeting that he believed a better amendment,could be drawn and a committee was.appointed to draft one.. The matter had to be put over until this amendment could be offered to.the Commission. The Commission is endeavoring to change the zoning ordinance so that it would be possible to build multiple buildings in,.only part of the second residential zone or else change the second residential zone. He stated this was a difficult task and hoped that at the next meeting of the Planning Commission the amendment would have been.approved. Mr. Martin Flynn asked to be heard in the matter. He stated that he had appearee., before both the Planning Commission and the City Council and had paid to have a notice published in regard to the rezoning of his particular lot. He believed that his property should be removed from the fire zone and then if the second residential zone is to be changed he will have the right at that time to oppose the change or be in accordance with it. He believed that the change in the second residential zone had nothing to do with taking his property out of the fire zone and asked that the Council act at this meeting. Councilman Armstrong asked City Attorney McCarthy if, regardless of the outcome of any classification of the second residential zone, it would affect the. -advertising of the ordinance. Mr. McCarthy answered that if it were continued over frommeeting to meeting it would not affect the advertising. Under the circumstances, Councilman Armstrong moved, seconded by Councilman Britabhgi, that the recommendation of the Planning Commission be followed and the matter - placed on the agenda for the next meeting. Under the question, Councilman McNulty asked if by laying this matter over to the next meeting it would affect the publication of notice of 'hearing of ordinance to which=City Attorney McCarth,� an'sWered that -it Wo"ald not,. 'Motion carried unanimously. - 4 Affidavit of publication of parking limit ordinance was ordered filed on motion of Councilman Armstrong, seconded by Councilman McNulty. City Attorney McCarthy explained the prupose of the parking limit ordinance." Council-, man McNulty, seconded by Councilman Armstrong, moved adoption of ordinance. On .,•roll call, motion passed, Councilmen Anderson and Hilton absent. City Manager Mead reported on. the matter of q, woman welfare worker in the police department.. He,stated that he had a job classification which he was going to " ask the City Clerk to 'read and also stated that he wanted the Council's reaction before holding the examination. City Clerk Dodge read -the job classification. Councilman Armstrong asked if the State Peronnel Board had drawn up the classification to which City Manager Mead replied that he had told them what he wanted and that they had drawn it up. He said he believed it was very complete and very well done. Councilman Armstrong said he believed that the person -who could fill the requirements would be very well qualified. Mayor Granger asked if classification was to be referred to the Board of Review. City Manager Mead said he believed it should go to them. The recommendation was made that City 0