Laserfiche WebLink
1 <br />1 <br />Councilman Britschgi brought out the fact that the VTpltner Motor Company <br />,is parking old cars on the lot next to their place o.f.business,and asked what the <br />"Council,,, could •do to stop this situation. City Attorney Mc9grthy stated, there <br />was no regulation in any ordinance prohibiting this but stated that.if it became <br />a public nuisance_it could be abated as .such. He knew, of no law which could <br />prevent A person Prom storing cars on land he owns or leases. Mayor Granger <br />asked if Weltner owned the land to which City Manager Mead replied that they did. <br />„not.. Mayor Granger asked the City Attorney to look into.the matter and see if <br />there was any way the problem could.be overcome. Councilman Armstrong asked if <br />i.t:could be proven that the lot was being used as a used car lot. Councilman <br />R <br />'Armstrong stated that if these .cars are for sale and are stock in trade he.be-. <br />,lieved that would constitute a used car lot. City /Attorney McCarthy said he would <br />look into the matter and report at the next meeting. <br />7ity Manager Mead ,reported on the number.of city emOoyees ho drove 'city -cars home <br />at night. There are ten employees in all to whom this privilege is granted, the <br />reason being that the employee is either on twenty-four hour call .or his duties <br />require,.that.he.has transportation after normal. business hours.. Councilman Brits <br />seconded by. Councilman. Flatcher.,. -moved that the 'report be filed: ,.Councilman -.Brite: <br />chgi,., under the question, stated.that at the last meeting of the: Council', one, of <br />Councilmen had stated that employees of the P. G. & E., were not allowed to drive <br />company cars home <br />At night. He had contacted a representative of the P. G. & E. and was informed <br />that the employees were allowed to drive the company cars home. In 1938 or 1939, <br />the company had decided they were ,•.;going to deny the privilege but it was found <br />-,to be impractical and they.reinstated the privilege. City Manager Mead brought <br />out the fact that during the past week two emergencies had arisen which necessi- <br />tated the servicemen being called out in the middle of the night to reinstall <br />service. Mayor Granger stated that he had not entered into the discussion at <br />R <br />,the last meeting in regard to this matter but he believed it was the intention <br />of the councilman who did bring up the matter to satisfy the public that no un- <br />necessary driving was being done. He believed that what brought up the question <br />was that city cars were bding seen in front of theatres, etc., at night and that <br />,the public did not understand the practice. Councilmen Armstrong believed the <br />privilege should be continued but not abused. Motion passed unanimously. <br />lity Manager Mead reported on woman welfare worker. He had contacted the cities of <br />Palo Alto, and San Francisco and also the state Personnel Service and the salary <br />„range ran from $180 to $225 per month. He recommended that the City pay the <br />same rate as is paid the pat rolmen -,$167.50 plus th a $25.00 war bonus. Council- <br />man Fletcher, seconded by Councilman McNulty, moved that, recommendation of City <br />Manager be accepted and that the City Attorney be instructed to draw ordinance <br />to cover the rate of pay. Under the question, ffiity Manager Mead asked that this <br />ordinance include the emergency provision. Motion passed unanimously. Council- <br />man Armstrong moved, seconded by Councilman Fletcher, that this ordinance include <br />the emergency provision. Motion passed unanimously. <br />It•was moved by Councilman Fletcher, seconded by Councilman Britschgi, that Mr. Willis <br />Frost be appointed to succedd himself as a member of the Board of Review, <br />r <br />r� <br />