My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
BOOK 19_1942-09-08 to 1945-05-07
RedwoodCity
>
City Clerk
>
Minutes
>
1942 to 1945 Book 19
>
BOOK 19_1942-09-08 to 1945-05-07
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/12/2017 12:09:33 PM
Creation date
10/12/2017 11:50:13 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CC Index
CC Index - Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Type
Regular
Agency Type
City Council
Date
9/8/1942
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
466
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
fi) <br />should made a report of all 25 foot lots and see if adjoining property owners V= <br />purchase such lots. City Manager Mead advised the Council that Mr. Palm, in <br />making a sale of city -owned 25 foot lots, contacts only adjoining property owners <br />It was -the general consensus of opiniin that while nothing could be done legally <br />to prevent building on 25 foot lots,.it•should be discouraged as much -as possible <br />Mrs. Mirahontes asked City Attorney McCarthy if it is possible to sell property <br />for delinquent taxes during the duration. City Attorney McCarthy replied that <br />® it was possible but that• it• required the filing of an - affidavit that the owner <br />is not in the military service. Mrs.+Miramontes said the title company would not <br />pass on a tax sale. <br />Councilman Britschgi asked if it would not be possible to have a model ordinance and <br />thus prevent the.need of publishing ordinances in their- entirety inasmuch as <br />advertising space was so expensive. City Attorney McCarthy advised that ordinanc <br />must be published in full before they can become effective, <br />Councilman Britschgi asked whether all permits should be recorded, having in mind the <br />question brought up at the last meeting in regard to a temporary permit not <br />having been recorded. City Attorney McCarthy believed such per^m'its should -be <br />embodied in an instrument that can be -recorded and in such a way obviate any <br />1 <br />j objection that such a permit was not recorded. Councilman Britschgi asked if <br />1! abatement notices should be -recorded to which City Attorney McCarthy replied it <br />was not necessary inasmuch as they -were kept on record until abated. <br />k Councilman Armstrong asked the status of the Koemple suit. City Attorney McCarthy <br />i. replied that the two suits - one against the city=by Olive Koemple and the other <br />the city requesting the right to destroy the property - are to be tried on April <br />t� <br />11, 12 and 13. The suit for damages'is to be a jury trial. Both cases are to be <br />j tried on the same evidence and the damage suit will be tried first, lose rte <br />j ee:sfl :;_1�ta '40!e f4:v The other case will be tried before the court unless <br />i <br />the court grants the right to a jury trial. He asked that any councilman able <br />to attend the trial do so. <br />7laiins No. 3885 -to 3931 in the amount of $9399.65 were approved and ordered paid on <br />motion of Councilman McNulty, seconded by Councilman Hilton. 1lotion passed <br />unanimously. <br />7ity, Attorney McCarthy advised the Council that City Clerk Dodge had brought to his <br />attention a conflict between the State Election Laws and the City Charter in re- <br />gard to the time of counting absentee ballots. It is necessary to allow up to <br />and including six days after election for absentee ballots to be returned to the <br />city clerk. The State Law says the canvass of such votes shall be held on Tues <br />® April 18, and the Charter sets the regular meeting night of Monday, April 17, <br />I <br />The State Law supercedes the -Charter and, in the opinion of the City Attorney, <br />1 <br />is the one Which should be followed. The Council agreed to abide by the State <br />i Law. <br />On motion of Councilman;Fletcher,seconded•by Councilman Anderson, the meeting was <br />adjourned. <br />R. S. Do e, City Clerk <br />;s <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.