My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
BOOK 19_1942-09-08 to 1945-05-07
RedwoodCity
>
City Clerk
>
Minutes
>
1942 to 1945 Book 19
>
BOOK 19_1942-09-08 to 1945-05-07
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/12/2017 12:09:33 PM
Creation date
10/12/2017 11:50:13 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CC Index
CC Index - Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Type
Regular
Agency Type
City Council
Date
9/8/1942
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
466
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
conditions in this area. Councilman Anderson asked the City Attorney the proper <br />procedure to follow in this instance and was advised that under the zoning1 <br />ordinance it was necessary to refer the matter to the Planning Commission who <br />would hold a public hearing after notices to property owners in that district <br />* had been sent and,would then make a recommendation back to the Council. The <br />Council would publish a notice in the newspaper if the recommendation were in <br />favor of the hospital. Councilman•Anderson moved that the -matter be referred to <br />the Planning Commission, seconded by Councilman Armstrong. Motion passed <br />unanimously. <br />City Attorney McCarthy reported on the matter of the hearing before the Railroad <br />Commission in regard to Mr. Martin's application for consolidation of the bus <br />line from San Carlos to Redwood City and from Redwood City to Palo Alto and re- <br />turn. It was his opinion that these applications would be granted and believed <br />that the Railroad -Commission would render a decision within two or three weeks. <br />In regard to the ordinance prohibiting the cutting up of houses into one and two <br />room apartments, City Attorney McCarthy was of the opinion that this report <br />was not due until the .second meeting of May and asked that the matter be held <br />over until the next meeting. <br />City Manager Mead reported on the house at 35 Hudson Street, stating he had <br />who informed him that he War Housing Authority <br />contacted Mr. Lengfeld of the War Housing Authority//had not granted permission <br />to Mrs. Hollenbaugh to convert her house into apartments in violation of city <br />ordinances: It was moved that the report be placed on the agenda for the next <br />meeting on motion of Councilman Anderson, seconded by Councilman Armstrong.} <br />Under the question, Councilman Britsehgi asked if it would be possible to stop tttJJJ <br />the growth of such places but not disturb those now in existence, his reason <br />being that there is a great housing shortage at the present time and he felt <br />the contemplated action would create a greater shortage. He believed the present <br />condition was a temporary one and would straighten itself out after the war. <br />Councilman Armstrong stated he was in sympathy with the housing shortage but <br />was not in favor of temporary permits being issued. City Manager Mead stated <br />that from a standpoint of administration .it would be difficult to determine <br />where to draw the line and that ordinances would be followed. He informed the <br />Council that Mrs.-Hollenbaugh had already been notified to discontinue her <br />rooming house. It was the general opinion of the Council that they were not in <br />favor of issuing temporary permits and that the ordinance should be abided by. <br />1• <br />The motion before the Council passed unanimously, <br />'There was a general discussion in regard to the abatement of ten buildings on which <br />a report was submitted at the last meeting. Councilman Fletdher was of the <br />opinion that the matter should be laid over to the next meeting to enable all <br />councilmen to personally inspect the buildings. Councilman Granger stated he i9@��IJJ1 <br />had.inspeeted all the buildings and moved that the owners of these buildings <br />be ordered to appear before the Council and show cause why they should not be <br />removed, seconded by Councilman Armstrong. Councilman McNulty was not in favor <br />of the motion inasmuch as one of the ovmers was ill and he did not believe it <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.