My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
BOOK 19_1942-09-08 to 1945-05-07
RedwoodCity
>
City Clerk
>
Minutes
>
1942 to 1945 Book 19
>
BOOK 19_1942-09-08 to 1945-05-07
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/12/2017 12:09:33 PM
Creation date
10/12/2017 11:50:13 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CC Index
CC Index - Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Type
Regular
Agency Type
City Council
Date
9/8/1942
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
466
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
City Attorney read excerpt from the Charter,,,Seotion 599 stating that demands <br />after being approved by the city manager and allowed by the council shall be <br />signed by the mayor and warrants prepared by the city ole#, numbered the same <br />as the demand, shall be signed by the mayor and city clerk or such other officer <br />as the d6uncil may designate, provided, however, that.such demand shall be <br />approved by the city auditor whenever prescribed by the council. It was decided <br />to abide by the Charter and have the mayor sign the claims. <br />There•was some discussion in regard to toe same person being city treasurer <br />and city auditor. Councilman Granger stated that Mr. Dodge had been appointed <br />treasurer and auditor to enable him to enter any city department and set up <br />systems without a controversy arising. Councilman Armstrong was of the opinion , <br />that the treasurer should be a check upon the auditor and vice versa, therefore, <br />the same man should not be appointed to the two positions, and moved that the <br />appointment of Mr. Dodge as auditor be rescinded. Councilman Anderson moved <br />that the matter be continued to the next meeting until the city manager and city <br />attorney had had an opportunity to wotk out a feasible solution, and a report <br />be submitted by, them at that time, seconded by Councilman McNulty. Motion <br />passed unanimously. <br />Mrs. T. D. Hollenbaugh appeared before the Council in regard to her house at 35 Hudson <br />Street. She stated she had defense workers and Navy personnel living at her <br />home and asked that she be allowed to continue as at present for the duration <br />of the war.' Mayor Hilton asked Mrs. Hollenbaugh to contact City Manager Mead <br />who would inform her of the Council's action taken earlier in this meeting* n- <br />t_`� f <br />Councilman Granger stated that about a month ago there had been a discussion regard- <br />ing the,eivil service regulations and made the suggestion that each member of <br />the•counell appoint a citizen to a study committee to study the present system. <br />Councilman G ranger <br />moved, <br />seconded by Councilman Anderson, that money be <br />appropriated <br />to pruehase a flag <br />to replace the large flag which flew on Memorial <br />Day and <br />other holidays. Motion passed unanimously. <br />Councilman McNulty asked if it would be possible to have the soldier monument at the <br />cemetery painted -before Memorial Day, City Manager Mead reported that the matter <br />has already been taken care of - the soldier will be painted and the roads put <br />in good condition. <br />Councilman Granger asked the status of a house on Fuller Street, City Manager Mead <br />reported that the matter is being corrected and that the building was in >� <br />violation of several -ordinances, <br />4 <br />Councilman Granger questioned the validity,of claims for car mileage by Mr. McArthur <br />and Mr. Aandlett; stating he believed it was necessary to pass a resolution to <br />allow such claims. City Attorney McCarthy stated that a.claim for mileage was <br />no different than any other claim. City Manager Mead stated that the shortage i <br />of cars necessitated the use of personal cars and the, claim for mileage. <br />Councilman Granger questioned the validity of a claim for witness fee of <br />$5,00 paid to <br />A nurse at the Community Hospital for appearing as a witness in the Roemple <br />trial. City Attorney McCarthy stated that he had presented the claim in behalfy <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.