My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
BOOK 19_1942-09-08 to 1945-05-07
RedwoodCity
>
City Clerk
>
Minutes
>
1942 to 1945 Book 19
>
BOOK 19_1942-09-08 to 1945-05-07
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/12/2017 12:09:33 PM
Creation date
10/12/2017 11:50:13 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CC Index
CC Index - Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Type
Regular
Agency Type
City Council
Date
9/8/1942
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
466
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF SPECIAL MEETING <br />REDWOOD CITY COUNCIL <br />JUNE 19 1944 <br />7:30 P. M. <br />j On roll call, the following were,present: Councilmen H. F. Anderson, Carl Britschgi, <br />f E. A. Fletcher, F. D. Granger, G., W. McNulty, Mayor W. W.. Hilton and City Clerk <br />ff R. S. Dodge. Also present was City Manager R. W. Mead. <br />f` <br />Mayor Hilton explained that hie purpose in calling this special meeting was to open <br />E for further discussion the action of the Council at the meeting of May 29th <br />in denying permit to conduct Benefit Whist and Bunco party to Local 76, A. W. <br />C. I. 0. He stated that he had received several telephone calls, also a visit <br />I from Mrs. Estella Lee asking that the Council reconsider. Mayor Hilton also was <br />visited by an officer of the 0. I. 0. from San Francisco. He stated further <br />that he resented the pressure being brought on the members of the council in an <br />attempt to have them change their vote, and that .if he did vote to rescind the <br />previous motion, he would do so with the distinct understanding there would be <br />no further permits issued for Sunday dances or card parties. <br />Councilman McNulty stated that the Local 76 Committee should have applied for permit <br />before printing and selling tickets to the function. He also resented pressure <br />being applied and stated that he would vote against rescinding the motion. <br />Councilman Anderson stated he would favor rescinding the previous motion with the <br />understanding the action was not to be taken as a precedent. He was of the <br />opinion that the Council should take into consideration the abnormal times. He <br />stated further that while he did not wish to be cooerced into changing his vote, <br />he did not wish to antagonize the local union. By allowing the permit, the <br />indident would be soon forgotten, while to deny it would undoubtedly stir up <br />considerable feeling on the part of the members of the union. He called <br />attention to the fact that the Federal Government was handling matters with the <br />unions as diplomatically as possible with a, view to keeping relations harmonious„ <br />He closed his remarks by recommending.that the Council change their former vote <br />and allow this one permit with the distinct understanding that the Council take <br />a definite stand against any future requests of this nature. <br />Councilman Fletcher moved to allow permit for Sunday,,June 4th seconded by Council- <br />man Anderson. <br />Councilman Britschgi stated he resented the pressure group working on the Council and <br />stated further he was prepared to change his vote of May 29th in favor of <br />granting permit to a negative vote. <br />Councilman Granger stated he was of the same opinion as the ones stated above, and <br />wished to be on record as not yielding to any pressure if he changed his vote. <br />He stated the committee was definitely in the wrong in not applying for permit <br />before going ahead with the arrangements. <br />Councilman Fletcher withdrew his motion as did Councilman Anderson his second, and <br />substituted in its place a motion to rescind the action of May 29th, and <br />Councilman Anderson seconded the motion. Councilman Fletcher stated he made the <br />motion with the understanding that no precedent was being established. <br />i <br />b <br />0 <br />i <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.