Laserfiche WebLink
J. T. McCandless appeared for Margarete F. Carroll, owner of property located at <br />16U Valota Road, Lot 16, Valota Park, 2 room board and batten.shack, 3 room <br />'board and batten shack and a large barn. Mr. McCandless stated that the owner <br />had requested him to tear down the shed. <br />Building Inspector Duncan testified as follows: . <br />Q. There is more than one building on this property? <br />A. There are two little buildings that are used for.dwellings and a barn - board <br />and batten house. <br />Q. No studs, no foundation? <br />A. That's right. <br />Q. Out of level and plumb? <br />A. That's true. <br />Q. The privy is not in conformity with the ordinance? <br />A. No air. _ <br />Chief Ryan testified as follows: <br />Q. Did you examine these premises? <br />A. Yes - two small buildings other than the one occupied by this gentlemen. <br />Q. It is a fire hazard? <br />A. Yes - extreme fire hazard. <br />Councilman Fletcher moved, seconded by Councilman McNulty, that the matter.be <br />continued to the second meeting in July. Motion passed unanimously. <br />Mrs. Benjamin Fireman appeared before the council in regard to an old shed which has <br />been used for living purposes and- is now vacant on Lot 22, Block 5, Vera Avenue <br />Villa: Building Inspector Duncan testified as follows:. <br />Q. You reported no foundation, board and batte, floor on ground, no studding, <br />bad fly condition, do you recall the place? <br />A., Yes.. I think the majority is for the health department.. The big kick on it <br />was that Tammany was'living there and there were no toilet facilities at all. <br />Health Inspector Stein reported as follows: <br />.Q. Did you make an inspection of this property? <br />A. Made an examination of old shed. Believe an Oakie family had been living <br />there. Undoubtedly they created soiAe of the depredations - human excreta, <br />garbage outside the door, board and batten, floor on ground, inadequate <br />window space, ceiling height inadequate - minimum is 9 feet for living pur- <br />poses. Of course, as it is now it. is.left open. People can go in there and <br />create depredations. <br />Mrs. Fireman stated she did not know of any Oakie family living in the building. <br />She said Mr. Tammany rented the shed to park his wagon and had made a room to live . <br />in. She stated no one was living in it now and that it was unfit for human <br />habitation. Councilman Armstrong asked if it would be possible for the place to <br />be cleaned. Health Inspector Stein replied that if the garbage and excerta were <br />removed and the structure used for storage purposes, it would be all right. <br />Councilman Armstrong moved, seconded by Councilman Anderson, that the matter be <br />postponed for thirty days to allow time for the property to be cleaned and a re- <br />port made at the second meeting in July., Under the question, Councilman Britschg!i <br />asked if thirty days time would not be allowed if the resolution were adopted. <br />Councilman McNulty replied that thirty days tJ#e would be allowed but the council <br />would be forced to take action at that time. Councilman Ar$tstrong stated that <br />Mrs. Fireman admitted the building was unfit for human habitation and -he was <br />willing to give her an opportunity to clean the property. Motion passed unanimouCly. <br />No one appeared in behalf of August Fabro, owner of Lot 3, Block 13, Range D. <br />Mezesville, a former 2 car garage. Building Inspector Duncan reported that Mr.. <br />Fabro is fixing the building and he believed it would be all right. Councilman <br />Anderson moved, seconded by Councilman Armstrong, that the matter be continued <br />to the second meeting in July. <br />