Laserfiche WebLink
f7 <br />who lived outside the city. He stated that he had heard no comments from the <br />council that Lir. Mead was being fired because hA was incompetent on the job. <br />He stated he'had been present when the council was considering the appointment <br />of a city manager and he believed at that time that they had given a great deal <br />of consideration to the appointment of Iulr. Mead whose training qualified him <br />for the position. He stated that the city manager was responsiblb for the <br />maintenanbe of several publib- utilities and the citizens of Redwood City were <br />far more interested in a good .iob well done than whether or not the city mana- <br />ger lived in Redwood City. He believed it was the wrong time to make such a <br />decision.' Mr. Mead had given a great deal of time and effort to formulating <br />postwar plan's which were about to be set before the public and he did not be- <br />lieve it was right to oust Mr. Mead. He said there had been several disputes <br />between the council and departmental heads which he did not understand and that <br />tonight the city manager was being "put on the darpet". <br />Mr. Harry Harrison addressed the council stating that he had been a resident,of <br />Redwood City since 1931. He accused certain members of the council of making <br />things difficult for Mr. Mead ever since he had been appointed 'and did not <br />believe the council should force a.man to pay inflation prices for a home in <br />Redwood City. <br />Mr. W. L. Meussdorffer addressed the council in behalf of Mr. Mead, stating that he <br />had been a real estate agent in Redwood City since 1926 and that he had not <br />rented a house for the last year and a half. He stated that Mr. Mead was <br />doing an excellent job and that he was a man any citizen c6uld approachwithout <br />fear of favoritism being shoran and used good judgment. <br />Mr. Alfred Morton again asked for permission to address the counci; and was given <br />permission to do so. He stated that, as a city employee, he was very happy'to <br />work under Mr. Mead, who had made it possible for the city to carry on the <br />best recreation program in its history. He stated that he, personally, had <br />been evicted from his home and that he had been forced to pay rent that was <br />almost three times more than the house was worth and that he was subject to <br />being evicted at any time. He asked the council to reconsider the motion and <br />to take into consideration the war time conditions. <br />Councilman Fletcher stated that he realized what the Charter stipulates but that, <br />owing to the fact that Mr. Dlead was being put 'out on a limbs', he was going to <br />vote against the motion. He stated that Mr. Ilfead was doing a good job and <br />that, in his opinion, it would be hard to replace him. <br />Mr. C. I.4. Goodman addressed the council stating that now was not the time to throw <br />insinuations. He stated that when the motion before the council was being <br />made and seconded, he thought of the Federal Government Who has thrown over <br />practically every law except the Bill of Rights to win the war, and said he <br />~ would hate to see the City of Redwood City put in a ludicrous position. He <br />stated that Mr. Mead was a very able and intelligent man and' said he would <br />• hate to see the mbralbxof the city broken over such a flimsy exduse. He <br />thought Redwood City would be placed in a very embarrassing position if the <br />city'manager were put out because he did not live in Redwood City. <br />1* <br />