My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
BOOK 19_1942-09-08 to 1945-05-07
RedwoodCity
>
City Clerk
>
Minutes
>
1942 to 1945 Book 19
>
BOOK 19_1942-09-08 to 1945-05-07
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/12/2017 12:09:33 PM
Creation date
10/12/2017 11:50:13 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CC Index
CC Index - Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Type
Regular
Agency Type
City Council
Date
9/8/1942
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
466
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
IJSft- <br />V4W <br />P°'*. <br />Y <br />City Attorney McCarthy stated that he did not believe it was a violation of the <br />�I <br />Charter because it has to be read in the trend of the times. The Charter was <br />written•in 1929 and from 1929 to 1941, it was easy to find a home in Redwood <br />�t City. He stated if. the a=icil accepted Mr. 1.4ead's statement that he had tried <br />to find a home to live in in Redwood City and that he had been unable to do so, <br />I� he did not feel that the council would be violating the Charter if they continQ <br />ued Mr. Mead's appointment. He stated that the City Manager is not under civi_ <br />=y� service, has no tenure in office and that the Charter does not compel a man to <br />i <br />buy a home in Redwood City. He stated that if Mr. Mead was fortunate enough <br />} to be able to rent a home, he would have no assurance that he would not be <br />evicted in ninety days inasmuch as it is impossible to wake -long term leases <br />today. He stated he did not beliege it was so much a legal question as an <br />j <br />interpretation of each one's -heart and mind. <br />Councilman McNulty asked iAiat the answer would be if a taxpayer objected to <br />i. paying the city manager's salary, to which City Attorney Uc.Carthy a.ndwered tha <br />�= that would probably be the only way to get a legal answer to the question. <br />�! Mr. Leo McQuiston, a city employee, spoke in behalf of Mr. Mead, stating <br />that he had also lived outside the city and finally had been able to purchase <br />ii <br />a home here but that he had been put to a great deal of expense in doing so. <br />a <br />i' He stated that Mr. -Mead cooperated 100% with the city employees. <br />Mayor Hilton stated he was going to vote in favor of the motion, saying <br />i' <br />�i <br />that the city manager had been -given notice that •the position would be vacant <br />I;• on the 1st of August. He also stated that if Mr. Mead found a home in Redwood, <br />1 <br />he would vote to reappoint him. <br />City Manager Mead said he appreciated the many complimentsand the support <br />rendered him and said there was a technicality by which he could become a <br />1� <br />resDient of the city and asked the council if it would consider leis renting <br />a room in Redwood City in order to become a qualified resident of the city <br />{. with the guarantee that -he would not lessen his efforts to try to locate a <br />place to live. As soon as a house is available which is at all suitable to his <br />needs, he would rent it and he would give the further assurance that as soon as <br />building materials are available he will buy a lot and build himself a home. <br />He asked for City Attorney McCarthyls,opinion as to the legality of this plan. <br />City Attorney McCarthy was of the opinion that if Mr. Iliead rented a room and <br />moved in some of his possessions and slept there some of the time'- it would <br />be a legal residende. <br />Councilman Britschgi said he would not ask•any man to leave his family and <br />Y, I <br />live apart from them in order to hold a positionuith the City of Redwood City, <br />�! He believed it was a shame that such a thing had to come up. <br />R <br />Councilman Granger asked City Attorney McCarthy if he knew of any similar <br />i <br />case which had been contested. City Attorney McCarthy cited a case in San <br />j Francisco after the earthquake Which was similar and the court ruled that inas- <br />much as the defendant intended to make San Francisco his home and did have a <br />C� room there, it was sufficient for legal residence. <br />I� <br />Some of the Councilmen wished to have the motion restated and Councilman <br />Armstrong explained that ills motion was to disqualify Mr. Mead as City Manager <br />Ik <br />G <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.