My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
BOOK 19_1942-09-08 to 1945-05-07
RedwoodCity
>
City Clerk
>
Minutes
>
1942 to 1945 Book 19
>
BOOK 19_1942-09-08 to 1945-05-07
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/12/2017 12:09:33 PM
Creation date
10/12/2017 11:50:13 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CC Index
CC Index - Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Type
Regular
Agency Type
City Council
Date
9/8/1942
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
466
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Communication was received from the State Board of Equalization of ref ereeIs'findings <br />and recommendations after hearing in :,egard to the matter of the protest of the <br />City Council against the issuance of an on sale beer license t6 Thornton Walker, <br />dba Two Friends Cafe. The recommendation was that - the application be denied for <br />the reason that the &p -p 18: 81 :3=a41 '3? t.a; ? .sof: th,: t it ;, premises pro- <br />bably would become a police problem. There was also a communication from George <br />Id. Stout, State Liquor Administrator, which advised that this recommendation was <br />not a final decision'by the"Board and that the Board would render a final de- <br />cision at a later date. Communication was ordered filed. <br />Communication was received from the League of California Cities advising that a one <br />day conference was to be held in San Francisco on October 10th at the Fairmont <br />Hotel from 10:00 A.Dl. to 9:00 P.M. <br />City Attorney McCarthy entered the meeting. <br />The Clerk noted those signifying their intention of attending the conference. <br />Application was received from Midway Creamery operated by V1. E. Mansfield for a trans- <br />fer of restaurant license. The creamery was former operated by Pearl and Elmer <br />Gange. License fee of $15.00 for balance of the year has been paid. Councila- <br />man Fletcher moved, seconded by Councilman Anderson, that permit be granted. <br />Councilman Armstrong, under the question, asked. if the. restaurant had been in- <br />spected by the health department, to which Inspector Stein replied that it had <br />not been for the past two months. Councilman Fletcher amended his motion to in- <br />clude subject to the approval of the health deL)artment. Motion passed uanimouslT. <br />Application was received from Lars 0. Anderson and Leonard Id. Hansen for restaurant <br />license at 768 Woodside Road. The Clerk advised the Council that at the last meet- <br />ing the Council had voted to protest the issuance of a liquor license to F. Mon- <br />isteri at this same address. In. the application for a restaurant license, the <br />applicants state they have liquor for on sale spirits, P -7613-E, on sale beer <br />and wine, A -11587-E. The Clerk stated he had i:a°itten to the Board of Equaliz- <br />ation advising the Council wished to protest the issuance of a liquor license to <br />Mr. Monisteri at this address and that he had received a reply on September 28th <br />advising that the Council hrd no grounds to oppose the issuance of the license <br />and that if the Council wished to file a new protest it was necessary to file it <br />not later than September 27th. The letter was received too late to file a new <br />protest. <br />Attorney James O'Keefe, Jr. appeared before the Council in behalf of Mr. <br />Anderson and Mr. Hansen, stating that the zone in which the restaurant would be <br />located permits restaurants, that the persons rano are to operate the business <br />are fit and proper persons and the health department gave a gr=ade of 94.5, an <br />A ratin37 after inspecting the premises. He stated he believed the license for <br />a restaurant was denied at a previous meeting because of the number,of protec- <br />tants who, he believed, thought it wotild be e revival of an establishment run <br />by Cal Bunyard. He presented affidavits signed by Philip A. Bunyard oxia Una L. <br />Bunyard stating that they are owners of the property upon vFnich the restaurpnt <br />is located, that they have entered into a lease agreement with Mr. Anderson and <br />Mr. Hansen, that there is no relationship betr:een them , that their son, Ce. <br />Bunyard, hfs no right, title or interest in the premises and that their only <br />interest <br />in <br />the matter <br />is to <br />secure performance <br />of the lease. <br />Pair. O'Keefe aske� <br />to have <br />this <br />affidavit <br />filed <br />with Vae <br />restaurant <br />application. <br />.0 <br />1 <br />1 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.