My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
BOOK 19_1942-09-08 to 1945-05-07
RedwoodCity
>
City Clerk
>
Minutes
>
1942 to 1945 Book 19
>
BOOK 19_1942-09-08 to 1945-05-07
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/12/2017 12:09:33 PM
Creation date
10/12/2017 11:50:13 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CC Index
CC Index - Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Type
Regular
Agency Type
City Council
Date
9/8/1942
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
466
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
0, <br />Councilman ArmstronG moved that the permit be denied and the matter placed <br />on the agenda of the next meetin,-, stating it was impossible to grant a permit <br />but.that this would give Mrs. O'Dell two or three weeks to find a place to live. <br />City Manager MQad asked if by this motion he was being instructed to overlook <br />the viola,tign of the ordinance. It wps agreed that he was, and there was no <br />second to the motion. <br />Health Inspector Stein advised the Council that he believed there were <br />vacancies at two trailer camps. Mrs. O'Dell stated these camps did not have bus <br />service which was necessary for her to have in order to get her to her work. <br />Councilman Anderson moved that the city ::Tanager be instructed to find out <br />if there is a violation of the ordinance and to report it at, the next meeting. <br />Councilman Britschg.i said he would not vote for the motion inasmuch as it was <br />practically granting the permit. <br />Mrs. O'Dell then stated she was not living, in the trailer and it was de- <br />cided that inasmuch as she was not living in it she could park it 'on they parking <br />lot. <br />J$ity Clerk Dodge read petition from residents of Palomar Park requesting annexation to; <br />the City of Redwood City. A map., showing the district proposed to be annexed, <br />was also presented. <br />Mr. V. Skogsberg of Loma Road, one of the signers of the petition, appeared <br />before the Council stating that it was their belief that it would be advantageous: <br />to be annexed to the city because it would enhance property values and the dis- <br />trict would get a continuous water supply which it does not get at the present <br />r <br />time. He said that if annexed to the city,°the district would be able to receive, <br />its water from the city. The; system is in and all that would be required is that <br />the crater be pumped in. <br />The fact that the IoTler part of Palomar Park was not included in the pro- <br />posed annexation was questioned by members of the Council who f elt that -the propcised <br />area was too cut up and would create a great deal of expense to provide protec- <br />tive services. It was explained that the residents of the lower part of the dis-, <br />trict were already receiving water from the city and for that reason were not <br />interested in being annexed. <br />Councilman Armstrong asked vhat the cost would be to supply water to this <br />district: City Manager Mead explained that the cost would be absorbed by the <br />water department _end later on the system would have to be revamped inasmuch as <br />second hand pipe has been used -in that district. <br />t Councilman Britschgi moved that the matter be referred to the Planning Com- '. <br />• �' mission and a report be had at the next nesting of the 'Council,- seconded by <br />Councilman Fletcher. Motion passed unanimously. <br />Councilman Gran4er moved that the City Manager be instructed to make a com- <br />plete survey of,the district,,including a survey of the pipe lines, the cost of <br />the water system, tax rate, fire protection needed, etc. Councilman Anderson was; <br />of the opinion this survey would be a little premature in view of the fact that <br />*• the matter has been referred to the Planning Commission for their recommendation.. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.