BOOK 20_1945-05-21 to 1946-09-03

Browse Search

120 letter from Mr. Green and the Pla,nninr Commission be incorpor,-ted in the minutes. Redwood City Council Redwood City, California. Gentlemen: In connection with our a pliccticn for approval of the resubdivision of Lot # 9, Williams, Wooster & Montpomery Tract, into twenty-three (23) building sites, we nerewitr. wish to inform. the City Council that we are agreeable to the recommendation of the Planning Commission that trees be planted as suggested by the City Park Department. We also agree herewith to furnish any Bond that might be required to guarantee the installation of the Street Improvements in confirmity with the requirements of the City Eng'ineer's office. It is our intention to call for Bids on the Improvements at once, in hope that tire will be able to have the construction of the new street started before the .linter rains set in; therefore we would appreciate it greatly if the Council will give our-n-olication consideration at the earliest *possible moment. Very truly yours, Greene Bros. By: Ranh H. Greene. Applic^tion of Mr. F. C. 17illiams for subdivision of lots on Arlinr-ton Road wa,s received. Councilman Britschgi, seconded by Councilman Anderson, moved that it be placed on agenda until next meeting, Mr. "7.illiams brought out the fact that he had consulted Buildinp� Ins_oector Dunc^.n before proceeding and and had been advised he could build aaraxe on th^t location indicated on blue prints. City Attorney McCarthy and Building: Insnector Duncnn could not locate nnytting in the ordinance that specifically ruled rgainst this. Councilman Granger then moved, seconded by Councilman Anderson that per- mit be grFntea; if neighborsoccupying house on left side furnish building insr)ector with satisfactory evidence that they do not object to location of garage. Motion carried.. f On motion of Councilman Britschgi, seconded by Councilman McNulty, offer of property on Chestnut Street to Recreation Commission eras carried on agenda. On motion of Councilman Granger, seconded by Councilman Anderson, last three items on agenda were carried over until next meeting. City ?Lttorney McCarthy reported on contrcct oetv,een city orn. Mr. ;:g. G. Frost, which he stated he had submitted to Councilman _irmstrona. The 1 -tier questioned only one -o-rt, t not referring to haying : fee to Mr. Frost, bcsed on an estimated coat of $300,000, when it :^aG 1,oFsicle the .-ork would cost 8250,000 or possibly less. Attorney HcOarthy strted that he felt that ,%ould be acceptable to Mr. Frost, Ls ^11 he wants is to be assured that he will not h-;ve to Tait for a long period of time for his commission. If the work cost -pore than $250,000 he colil.d collpot his commission up to250,n00, until the cont:^ct v.as let, and then he could collect the b^lance. Councilman Armstroncz moved, seconded by Councilman Britsch>ri and un,,^nimously carried on roll call, the, �dontion of resolu- t ion. RESOL TT T ION No. ?36 M pu I !II