|
155
<br />IN WITNESS R'HEREOF, I have hereunto set my hnd and the
<br />sect of the City of Redwood City this day of December, 194b.
<br />DODGE
<br />City Clerk of the City of Redwood City
<br />Oomm unica,tion was received from Robert B. Scamrerin requesting reToning of
<br />property at lbbO Vrlota Roed from second residential to business for the
<br />purpose of constructing' greenhouses. Councilman Fletcher moved, seconded
<br />by Councilman Anderson, th^t the communication be r?ferred to the
<br />Plan-ning' Commission. ?Motion passed un; nimously.
<br />' Communicction ::as received. from Willis and Maloney, sheet metal workers,
<br />220 I,icrshall Street, requesting that twenty or thirty feet of curbing in
<br />front of their plc.ce of business be designated as either a no parking
<br />or loading none. Mayor Hilton asked ;;hat son- this location wear in and
<br />questioned. r:netr..er r. sheet met -1 business should be in that location.
<br />City attorney PMcC^rtny advised he r:culd check to see if this concern
<br />should b- loc'-.trd in this zone. Councilman Anderson moved, seconded by
<br />FURTHER RESOLVED that notrithstanding such permission, the City Council
<br />the
<br />that the communication
<br />reserves richt, c_t -.ny time, to order the removol from the public ares,
<br />'
<br />of Wilson Street, of any structure constructed or mcint^ined thereon by
<br />their investigation and
<br />s.^id Southern Pncific Company, or Southern Pacific Railroad Company, or
<br />any successor or assign of eitner of them, and no vested right or title, or
<br />^G
<br />right of possession of any part of erid public street knovn ns Wilson Street
<br />W-4
<br />shall be 'dquired by said Gxrntees or any successor or assirn•of either of
<br />theme: bir re -son of :ccu;ancv of any portion of s: id street, and said Grantees
<br />Mt
<br />their successors and acsimrs, 7.,ree when as and if so ordered by said City
<br />Council of said City to remove any building, structure, or other hinder-
<br />ance or impediment to the complete use of said street within thirty (30)
<br />days of written notice so to do;
<br />FURTHER RESOLVED that this permission shall not be effective until
<br />written acceptance of all the provisions hereof is executed by or on
<br />behrlf of the permittees and filed t:,ith the City Clerk of this*City.
<br />I, RALPH S. DODGE, City Clerk of the City of Redwood City
<br />hereby certify that the foregoing is r. true end correct Dory of
<br />a, Resolution unanimously-,doPted by the City Council of said
<br />City it a regular meeting: thereof duly called and 'held at the
<br />City Hall in said City on the 3rd day of December, 1945, at
<br />which a, quorum was present.
<br />IN WITNESS R'HEREOF, I have hereunto set my hnd and the
<br />sect of the City of Redwood City this day of December, 194b.
<br />DODGE
<br />City Clerk of the City of Redwood City
<br />Oomm unica,tion was received from Robert B. Scamrerin requesting reToning of
<br />property at lbbO Vrlota Roed from second residential to business for the
<br />purpose of constructing' greenhouses. Councilman Fletcher moved, seconded
<br />by Councilman Anderson, th^t the communication be r?ferred to the
<br />Plan-ning' Commission. ?Motion passed un; nimously.
<br />' Communicction ::as received. from Willis and Maloney, sheet metal workers,
<br />220 I,icrshall Street, requesting that twenty or thirty feet of curbing in
<br />front of their plc.ce of business be designated as either a no parking
<br />or loading none. Mayor Hilton asked ;;hat son- this location wear in and
<br />questioned. r:netr..er r. sheet met -1 business should be in that location.
<br />City attorney PMcC^rtny advised he r:culd check to see if this concern
<br />should b- loc'-.trd in this zone. Councilman Anderson moved, seconded by
<br />passed unanimously.
<br />Councilman Armstrong moved, seconded by Councilm^.n Anderson, that the city
<br />manager or other appropriate adninistrative official investigate the -
<br />permit which was granted to � illis and Maloney. Motion passed 1anani-
<br />mously.
<br />Communication was received from 11. Weber requesting an extension of fifteen
<br />cn.lendar d,^ys to cora^fete the work under Resolutions of Intention Nos,
<br />194b-3 Pnd 1945-4, givin,' for reveons the shortage of labor, mcterials
<br />and inclement r-Pather. City IMc,nager Blom advised thct tnts contract
<br />comnletion date was ori;,*,,,ally October 1.1, and that Mr. Weber had been
<br />granted w S5 day ex;.e,.e_ on, mckinE the new c^n,-letion d,.te to December
<br />10. He rQeommnn,3e0 that the extension be granted with the sti-pulntien
<br />th; t the contrcctor rVy the cost of the ingn-otor daring thn.t period plus
<br />ti5,0/1 per d;tr enp7neerin7' CC�t�, Counc;lman Arnderson mov-d, seconded
<br />Councilm(n McNulty,
<br />that the communication
<br />be referred to the Traffic
<br />Study Committee for
<br />their investigation and
<br />recommendntion. r.Motion
<br />passed unanimously.
<br />Councilman Armstrong moved, seconded by Councilm^.n Anderson, that the city
<br />manager or other appropriate adninistrative official investigate the -
<br />permit which was granted to � illis and Maloney. Motion passed 1anani-
<br />mously.
<br />Communication was received from 11. Weber requesting an extension of fifteen
<br />cn.lendar d,^ys to cora^fete the work under Resolutions of Intention Nos,
<br />194b-3 Pnd 1945-4, givin,' for reveons the shortage of labor, mcterials
<br />and inclement r-Pather. City IMc,nager Blom advised thct tnts contract
<br />comnletion date was ori;,*,,,ally October 1.1, and that Mr. Weber had been
<br />granted w S5 day ex;.e,.e_ on, mckinE the new c^n,-letion d,.te to December
<br />10. He rQeommnn,3e0 that the extension be granted with the sti-pulntien
<br />th; t the contrcctor rVy the cost of the ingn-otor daring thn.t period plus
<br />ti5,0/1 per d;tr enp7neerin7' CC�t�, Counc;lman Arnderson mov-d, seconded
<br />
|