Laserfiche WebLink
156 <br />by Gcuncilmnr. Fletcnex, that the city �c;rnger'^ be :accepted. <br />Motion pnesed unarim ously. <br />Petition was received from property owner^ <br />or tha ur.yshore <br />Hirn ay, Yr.end Mrs, <br />(M <br />"t7 <br />Johnnie F. Bor"olio, H. F. Or -roc -lien, <br />Rose Rn- :!.rd Philli^ <br />Hess,xequestin-r <br />'? <br />the city to install fixe hydrants and <br />other nneessary <br />fire preventions in <br />and about St^tions 53/75 t.nd 54/25, <br />IV -SM -68-0 on the <br />Bayshore High; y. <br />f <br />City Mane.ger Blom explained that the <br />property of the <br />petitioners is now <br />I� <br />serviced by a 211 main which is merely <br />sufficient for <br />domestic needs. He <br />;presented e mep showing the location of this property. He suggested two <br />plans, one to extend main from Chestnut Street ;.lona Bayshore Highwav <br />approximately 3000 feet, and as an -alternative, to connect to present main <br />I <br />on Spring Street to a point northerly of the Red Feather property and then <br />run perallel to the high,,rcy about 1000 feet. The cost of either nlan wos <br />estimated at 19000 and is more than could justifiably be taken from the <br />water budget. He said thr..t considered from the stand -point of benefit to <br />the present occupants ;rho have improved property, they would. benefit throu7h <br />reduced insurance rates and could o.fford to contribute to the cost of the <br />main. On the other hend, by installing a large main it would be a benefit <br />to all property abutting on Bayshore Highway but he didn't '.row how cost <br />could be apportioned to undeveloped property. Councilman McNulty asked if <br />Fxiendly Acres ever came into the city whether these mains would serve them. <br />City Manager Blom advised that they are at present served by the California <br />Water Service. Councilman Anderson asked the status of the Friendly acres. <br />annexation proceedings. City Attorney McCarthy advised that all that is <br />required to annex this section is to file with the Secretary of the State <br />a certificate that the city accepts the property. Councilman Armstrong <br />expressed the opinion that it is impossible for the city to bear the whole <br />cost of installincr this main end moved that the matter be referred. to the <br />city me,nager with instructions to contact the property otrners to see what <br />apportionment of cost could be worked out with them. The motion wns <br />seconded by Councilman Anderson end p^ssed unanimously. L� <br />Communication -vies received from the San Mateo County Planninp, Commission advising <br />that it has several applications for rezoning Woodside Road frontages across <br />from the incorporated are-, of Redwood City r.nd it was their desire to dis- <br />cuss this rezoning, with city officin.ls before taking action. City !�,-Mager <br />Blom advised he hl_d replied to the connunio;Linn notifvin�.the County Plen- _ <br />ping Commission of the next meeting date of the City Pl-nning Commission <br />end advising that the matter lrould undoubtedly be referred to them. Council- <br />man Fletcher moved, seccnded by Councilman Anderson, that the matter be re- <br />ferred to the Planning Commission. Motion posed unanirnnusly. <br />Gommunicr.tion was received from Louise R. Evans requpstina running or Lot 102 <br />Block F on ';'oodside Road from restdentirl to business prnp-rt,r. Councilrman <br />i <br />lnderson moved, PecnndnO by Councilmnn Fletcher, th^t the matter be referred <br />to the Plnnrina Commission. Motion nr,sspO unorimously. <br />Communication received frnr? Elm^r Roes, Chn.irm^n of the Recre.tion Commissinn, <br />