Laserfiche WebLink
v <br />IS <br />0 <br />1 <br />10 <br />Mayor Hilton was of the opinion that the alterations.would constitute a false <br />front, while it was the opinion of Councilman Armstrong that �ftthe building <br />were remodeled as the plans show it would be a satisfactory building. It <br />was, however, brought out that under the new government order, it would be <br />impossible <br />to <br />make the alterations <br />inasmuch <br />as they <br />would cost <br />over X400, <br />therefore, <br />it <br />was believed unwise <br />to grant a <br />regular <br />permit due <br />to the fact <br />that it would be impossible to make the alterations. Councilman Armstrong <br />moved, seconded by Councilman McNulty, that Mr. Whizin present to the <br />Building Inspector a complete set of specifications for study by him before <br />the next meeting of the Council and that in the meantime Mr. Whizin be per - <br />mitted to operate this restaurant upon -the same conditions as have hereto- <br />fore been attached to the permit. Motion paseed unanimously. <br />City Attorney McCarthy advised that postcard notices had been sent to property <br />owners in regard to proposed improvements in Redwood Villa Park and setting <br />hearing for this meeting. Councilman Britschgi moved, seconded by Council- <br />man Anderson, that affidavit of Louise White of mailing such notices be <br />filed. Motion passed unanimously. <br />Mr. Samuel Marks, a resident of Redwood Villa Park, advised that several <br />residents of this area had.not received notices and that a canvass had been <br />made of several of the streets to determine who had and had not received <br />the notice. He presented a list of names to the City Attorney of those who <br />had not received the notice. City Attorney McCarthy explained that the <br />names had been taken from the assessment roll.and that it was believed that <br />all property owners had been advised, however, he said he would recheck the <br />matter. City Clerk Dodge advised that out of seventy notices sent out; <br />i <br />fifty-nine replies were received of which thirty-seven were in favor of <br />i' the.improvements and twenty-two against. <br />There were many residents of this area in the audience and several of them <br />spoke against the proposed improvements. They also requested that more <br />j� information be given to them as to the estimated cost and extent of the <br />improvements. Mayor Hilton explained that this matter had been brought up <br />�I because of a petition from residents in that area for -the improvements and <br />i <br />that the Council had directed notices be -sent to all property owners to as- <br />certain their reaction. After considerable discussion and it was decided <br />that notices be sent to all property owners including more definite plans <br />of the proposed improvements and thattthe notice include the number of <br />lineal feet owned by each property owner and estimated cost.of proposed <br />improvements. <br />City Manager Blom advised that he had investigated the matter of the statuer.of <br />improvements on Poplar Avenue and the American Trust Company had advised <br />him that they would release the $2500 held by them for street improvements <br />on Poplar Avenue to a contractor who has been engaged to do the work. There <br />was some discussion as to whether the plans included improving the whole <br />f street or whether some lots would be excluded. City Manager Blom advised <br />that such tupe of construction would not be allowed and that the bank and <br />II, contractor had informed him that the improvements were to be constructed <br />L , <br />299 <br />