BOOK 20_1945-05-21 to 1946-09-03

Browse Search

352 this.,4matter,, most of the Council being opposed to the location as requested by Mr. Martin and also being reluctant to make a definite decision at this meeting. Councilman Werder moved that the matter be referred to the Traffic Study Committee to be considered at the joint meeting with the Council and that some action be taken at this meeting to relieve Mr. Martinis situation until the final plan is outlined. Police Chief Collins expressed the opin- ion that he believed the Southern Pacific Company would extend the time to allow Mr. Martin to park his busses at the present stop. Councilman Werder incorporated in his motion that the Chief of Police endeavor to get ; the Southern Pacific Company to extend the time limit of allowing the trans- poration company to park at its present location. The motion was seconded by Councilman Granger and passed unanimously. City Clerk Dodge reported that a sale of real estate had been held in the morn- ing. Eight parcels had been advertised for sale. After the sale was over, there had been received by messenger from the San Mateo County Realty Com- pany a letter addressed to the Clerk which contained a higher bid on Lot 7, Block 10, Lenolt Tract, than had been received at the sale. Due to the fact that Mr. Weiner of the San Mateo County Realty Company had been present at the sale, had heard the bids and then submitted a higher bid, the Counoi.l decided not to accept his second bid. Councilman Armstrong moved, seconded by Councilman Werder, that with respect to Parcels 7, 6, and 8, the highest bid for Parcel 6 being $175.00 and equalling the minimum price set; the highest bid for Parcel 7 being $450.00, being in excess of the minimum price and for Parcel 8 the highest bid being $2020.00, being in excess of the minimum price, these bids be accepted. Under the question, City Collec- tor N. L. Miramontes advised that with regard to Parcel 7, the lot in question was a thirty foot lot which had been advertised at the request of the adjacent owner who did not submit a bid. She advised that the city has a tax deed to about 113 feet adjacent to this thirty feet. Councilman Armstrong amended his motion to delete Parcel 7 from the acceptance, sec- onded by Councilman Werder. Motion passed unanimously. Councilman Werder moved, seconded by Councilman Armstrong, that the bid on Parcel 7 be re- jected but that the rejection of the bid does not preclude a bid on the part of the adjoining property owner. Motion passed unanimously. City Manager Blom advised that the pencil sketch submitted as a tentative map of Poplar Subdivision No. 2 had been found and that it coincided with the final map as sbmitted. He said he would prefer that the other lots in the area would be included in the map but that it was not possible to force this property to join the subdivision. The area as submitted in the final map is satisfactory and has been approved by the Planning Commission. Councilman Armstrong offered resolution and moved its adoption accepting final map of resubdivision of Lot 51 of Reese Subdivision and Lots 10 to 14 inclusive in Block 1 of Redwood Oaks, known as Poplar Subdivision No. 2. RES GLUT ION No. 325 ACCEPTING FINAL MAP OF RESUBDIVISION OF LOT 51 OF REESE SUBDIVISION AND LOTS 10 to 14 INCLUSIVE IN BLOCK 1 OF REDWOOD OAKS, SUBDIVIDED AND DESIGNATED AS POPLAR SUBDIVISION NO.2. 40 J AV 1,l t.,