Laserfiche WebLink
55 <br />M <br />t� presented to the Council.. -He moved' that, the eppli.ca_tion:.be referred to -the <br />maker with the instruationa_to. adhere, to..the,,terms. <br />-of the.ordinattae. The mo- <br />tion was seconded by Councilman.Andereon_:and..pasaed unanimously. " <br />Communication was received from the Planning C.ommisaion_.wi.th_.a.everaZ recommendations <br />which were acte.d_.upon_.s.eparatelye. ..The...fira.t_.reaommendation_.was approving the <br />application of Victor and Marika.. Selivan,_.124 Lincoin.Avenue,.; for subdivision <br />of I Lot 9i.Block 2, New High.School Acres. A drawing .was submitted for the <br />Council's examination. There-was.some_diacusaion..in_regard..to the fact that <br />one` 16t did not meet the minimum...requirement.s-of..,the..city..a .footage for lotas <br />and the fact that.. the,.prop000d--aubdiv.ialon would .not_bs_.advantageous to ad- <br />joining Yproperty owners. Councilman..Britschgi_moved._ aeoonded by Councilman <br />. <br />Armstrong, that the.recommendation.be denied. Motion -passed unanimously. <br />The second recommendation. was:,raque..a.ting._the- _Council_..to ask the County <br />.� Planning Commission to give the Redwood City.Planning..Commission notice of <br />any proposed subdivisiona',._of..property-.outside... . sclibod.'C.ity_within three.miles <br />of any boundary of Redwood City. City Attorney�Mcoarthyadviaed that there has <br />been a recent act of legislature. which _givaa,.authority4"..t.o:...the,:city to request <br />the county to give' the city. notice ..of. -such subdtvisi.ons. _and...said that while the <br />county usually did give notice,., it. was. not.. known_mbe.ther they,.did for- a radius <br />of Vhrse. miles.. Councilman Armstrong _moved,....seconded..by... Councilman Granger, <br />that the council direct such a request to..the P.lanning..Commiseion. 4101ons <br />passed unanimously. <br />k The planning Commission advised that application of Archie DeMant Living - <br />ton, <br />Pp , <br />ton, California, for subdivision of Lot l,. -Block. 10s. -Oak. Knoll Manor, wag <br />denied by them. <br />The third recommendation was resolution recommending to. -the Couneil that <br />two parcels of property owned by Eily.C. Currias,indicated _on,.the map as. Lots <br />t� 9 and 10, Block 1, Redwood Villa Park; and.aareage._located between Boyd and <br />Kent's Addition and Redwood .Villa. Park ownad..b� .Angel`.o'.and...Margaret Franaeachini <br />i' and Guiseppe and Antoinette Ferrando, be clas.eified wi.thin..Fire:.Zone No. 2. Citr <br />` Attorney McCarthy ad*tsed that iahen this property had been rezoned fzo n residen- <br />tial to business he had inadvertently, negleated to_.state_.,the,.fire 'zone. He said <br />the fire district along E1 Camino Real.at..this location is in Fire _Zone No. 2p <br />and the above action would make all property.on E1_Camino_Real,a outh of Woodside <br />'r <br />6 Road consistent. Councilman Granger moved, seconded by Councilman Armstrong, t"ft <br />that the recommendation be approved. Motion_.paaaed unanimously. <br />Coannnication was received from.the California State.Chamber of Commerce urging a for- <br />l�l - <br />mation of a community veterans' affairs committee to assist -returning veterans. <br />Councilman Armstrong was of the opinion -that, inasmuch asthecounty has taken Us <br />