Laserfiche WebLink
Ott <br />i <br />i <br />fl <br />0) <br />Communication was received from Michael Counihan protesting paying garbage <br />fee in advance. City ,Manager Mead advised that all garbage bills are - <br />paid in advance and that Mr. Counihan was not being discriminated against. <br />Councilman McNulty moved, seconded by Councilman Fletcher, that a letter <br />be addressed to Mr. Counihan advising that he was not being discriminated <br />against as that was the rule for all garbage bills. Motion passed unani- <br />mously. <br />Communication was received from J. R. Fogal regarding taxes on 25 foot lot. <br />City Manager Mead advised that this matter had been b efore the Council <br />sometime ago and that the Council directed that action be taken to see if <br />the lot could be sold to adjoining property owners. These owners had not <br />made a reasonable offer and Mr. Fogal had been so advised and also advised <br />that the city could do nothing further in the matter. Councilma'n Anderson <br />expressed the opinion that inasmuch as Mr. Fogal had originally purchased <br />the lot in a tax sale he did not fee that the city was obligated in any way. <br />Councilman Armstrong moved that the City Clerk be instructed to advise Mr. <br />Fogal that the City Council is without authority to cancel taxes or refund <br />any money on this lot. The motion was seconded by Councilman Granger and <br />passed unanimously. <br />Communication was received from Nelle h. Miramontes, City Tax (Collector, advising <br />that the real estate committee had approved the sale of certain lots by San <br />Mateo County and that the sale price did not meet all the delirRuent bonds. <br />She asked that the Council cancel the sum of $672.64 on N.E. 1/4 of hot 5, <br />Block 11, Oak I{noll Manor on Bond Series F and the sum of $131.95 be can- <br />celled on Lots 62 7, Block il, Sweeneyts Addition on Bond Series I. Council- <br />man Fletcherrlmoved, seconded by Councilman Anderson, that the above amounts <br />be cancelled on these lots. Motion passed unanimously. <br />Communication was received from F. W. Hogg advising that in order to put road <br />through property formerly owned by Mr. Munson he needs hots 8 and 9 of Block <br />1 of Redwood Oaks. He advised that he had been able to buy Lot 9, but that <br />the owner of Lot 8 was asking an out -of -the -question pride for Lot 8 and <br />said that he would pay it if' necessary but asked that the city institute an <br />eminent domain suit to acquire th is'lot for the toad to be opened. He advised <br />that he was putting up $400.00 in the Peninsula Title Company to guarantee that <br />he will pay the amount for the lot if necessary. City Attorney McCarthy ad- <br />vised this would be a proper procedure but he believed the $400.00 guarantee s <br />should be placed with the city rather than the title company. Ile had prepared <br />the necessary resolution to proceed with the condemnation proceedings. Mr. <br />Hogg agreed t6' deposit the money with the city. Councilman Anderson offered <br />IT <br />