My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
BOOK 21_1946-09-23 to 1948-08-09
RedwoodCity
>
City Clerk
>
Minutes
>
1946 to 1948 Book 21
>
BOOK 21_1946-09-23 to 1948-08-09
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/12/2017 1:53:26 PM
Creation date
10/12/2017 1:38:19 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CC Index
CC Index - Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Type
Regular
Agency Type
City Council
Date
9/23/1946
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
517
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
170 James Avenue. It was explained that the garage was only two feet from the side <br />line and that the ordinance prohibited living quarters at that distance from the <br />sideline. Building had been started without a permit and the Building Inspector <br />had ordered the work stopped. It was explained to Mr. Mancipelo that the Council <br />could.not permit him to construct the living quarters in violation of the ordinance. <br />NICK FABBRO appeared before the Council reapplying for a permit to build apartments at <br />520 Arguello Street with the provision that he guarantee to move the adjoining <br />building from the property. He asked for the help of the Council in condemning <br />the property inasmuch as people are living in it and, according to O.P.A. regu- <br />lations, he would not be able to evict the tenants unless the property -were con- <br />demned. Councilman Werder believed the Council should grant Mr. Fabbro some <br />leniency. There were no plans presented of the proposed apartments and the Coun- <br />cil was reluctant to grant a permit without them. Councilman Swift suggested <br />that Mr. Fabbro present plans.and believed that if the building next door were <br />removed the main objection of'the Council would be overcome. It was suggested <br />that Mr. Fabbro present plans of the building to the Building Inspector and Fire <br />Inspector and if they met with their approval the matter could again be brought <br />before the Council. <br />THIS WAS THE TIME FOR THE PUBLIC HEARING IN REGARD TO APPLICATION FOR PERMIT TO CON- <br />DUCT A NURSERY SCHOOL on Madison Avenue between Ruby and Sapphire Streets. City <br />Clerk Dodge advised that notices had been sent out to property owners within <br />275 feet of the property and that no written protests had been received. The <br />Mayor asked if there were any verbal protests. <br />Mr. Walter Goodman, 630 Quartz Street, appeared in protest to the permit. He <br />was against the permit being granted because it was a commercial enterprise <br />and also did not believe that this type of school should be allowed in a resi- <br />dential area. <br />Mr. Edwin M. Jacobs, 736 Quartz Street, and Mr. Henry Frahm, 1633 Madison Avenue, <br />also appeared in protest. They stated there were several owners of vacant property <br />which they had not been able to contact. Councilman Britschgi moved that the <br />matter be carried on the agenda for the next meeting to allow the protestants <br />time to contact the owners of vacant property. City Attorney Currie suggested <br />that the matter be referred to the Planning Commission inasmuch as the zoning <br />ordinance provides that such hearings, -should be held the same as a hearing for <br />rezoning. Councilman Britschgi moved, upon advice of .the City Attorney, that <br />the matter be referred to the Planning Commission for a public hearing, seconded <br />by Councilman Swift. Motion passed unanimously. <br />CITY MANAGER BLOM REPORTED THAT PETITIONS TO PAVE ALLEY near Cleveland, Fulton, <br />Jackson and Jefferson had been received at the last meeting of the Council and <br />had been a little short of a fifty per cent Majority of the frontage. The <br />petitions had been returned to the signers and they had secured additional sign- <br />atures which now brings the petitions up to more than 500 of the frontage. He <br />stated that the Council can now proceed to have this alley paved if it so desires. <br />Councilman Granger questioned whether houses would be allowed to face on -the <br />alley and there was some discussion on this point. Mayor Hilton was of the <br />opinion that this point should be understood before any proceedings were started <br />F1 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.