Laserfiche WebLink
17 8 . , a <br />seconded by -Councilman Swift, that the Council take the necessary steps to prepare <br />condemnation proceedings on the property as discussed. Motion passes unanimously. ' <br />Councilman Werder moved that, subject to the approval of the Building Inspector and <br />Fire Inspector, Mr. Fabbro be permitted to make alterations as proposed at 520 <br />Arguello Street. Councilman Britschgi did not believe that the Building Inspector <br />r <br />could grant a permit in accordance with Building Code. Councilman Werder believed <br />the suggestion could be made to the Building Inspector and Fire Inspector that if ' <br />no greater fire hazard would exist the permit be granted. There was no second to <br />Councilman Werder's motion. Councilman McNulty was of the opinion that the ordi- <br />mance governing the type of building to built in this fire zone - Fire Zone No. 1 - <br />should be adhered to. Building Inspector Duncan stated that he believed it would <br />be_possible to make alterations in this fire zone up to 20% of the assessed valua- <br />tion of the building so long as the net result is an improvement to the fire hazard <br />condition. Councilman Granger moved, seconded by Councilman Swift,,that the permit <br />be granted subject to the Building Inspector's approval and any recommendation from <br />the Fire Department to make the building as fire proof as possible and subject to <br />the improvements not exceeding 20% of the assessed valuation. Councilman Britschgi <br />believed that if Mr. Fabbro was willing to spend more than 20116� of the assessed <br />valuation, he should not be limited to that in the event better materials would be <br />used in the improvement. Mr. Fabbro guaranteed that nothing else would be used in <br />the sidewalls of the building but 'sheet rock which is fire resisting. Motion passed <br />unanimously. <br />OATHS OF OFFICE were administered <br />to Mrs. Anna Bennett <br />Robb, Mrs. S. S. Mayo <br />and Mr. R. <br />McIntosh as members of the Park <br />and Recreation <br />Commission <br />and to Mr. John <br />R. Ball <br />as a member of the Traffic and Safety Commission. <br />BIDS FOR WORK TO BE DONE ON VALOTA <br />ROAD SEWERS were <br />opened and <br />tabulated. <br />The following <br />bids were received: <br />Item 1 <br />Item 2 <br />Item 3 <br />Total <br />Gabriel Construction Company <br />01.68 <br />01.18 <br />$114.50 <br />$7,44-34 <br />D. J. Bressie <br />2.25 <br />1.10 <br />160.00 <br />9,734.75 <br />L. C. Jensen <br />1.95 <br />1.35 <br />170.00 <br />No total <br />Atlas Pipe <br />1.80 <br />2.00 <br />138.00 <br />8,595.40 <br />Ed. Jarvis <br />1.90 <br />1.25 <br />130.00 <br />No total <br />A. J. Peters & Son <br />2. <br />l AO <br />•190.00 <br />10,970.20 <br />Francis John O'Shaugnessy <br />2.26 <br />1.70 <br />182.00 <br />No total <br />Edwin J. Tobin <br />2.60 <br />1.90 <br />120.00 <br />No total <br />M. Weber <br />2.55. <br />1.75 <br />150.00 <br />No.total <br />L. W. Jenson <br />.3 008 <br />3.65 <br />216.00 <br />No total <br />The necessary bidder's bond or certified check <br />was enclosed with each <br />bid. City <br />Manager Blom recommended that <br />the Engineering <br />Department be allowed to <br />check the <br />computations before awarding <br />the bid. <br />BUILDING INSPECTOR DUNCAN ADVISED <br />THAT THE SABLAN PROPERTY <br />WAS <br />still in the <br />same con- <br />dition as a few weeks ago but that Mr. Sablan had been ill and he recommended that <br />the abatement proceedings be carried on the agenda. The abatement proceedings , <br />against Joaquin Sablan's property at Ebener and Lincoln Streets were ordered carried I� <br />on the agenda, until the second meeting in June. <br />CITY CLERK DODGE ADVISED HE HAD MAILED NOTICES AND LETTERS to 18,owners of 24 parcels of <br />land in Oakwood Park No. 2 and that he had received answers from 13 owners covering <br />18 parcles of land as to whether or not they wished to have their property rezoned <br />from second residential district to first residential. 11 of the replies had been <br />in favor of the rezoning and 7 against. A Mr. Pardini spoke from the audience and <br />J <br />