My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
BOOK 21_1946-09-23 to 1948-08-09
RedwoodCity
>
City Clerk
>
Minutes
>
1946 to 1948 Book 21
>
BOOK 21_1946-09-23 to 1948-08-09
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/12/2017 1:53:26 PM
Creation date
10/12/2017 1:38:19 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CC Index
CC Index - Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Type
Regular
Agency Type
City Council
Date
9/23/1946
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
517
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
318 <br />check to ascertain if any error existed. If so, tax was subject to correction. If <br />investigation discloses no error in arriving at the assessment as shown, there will <br />be no recourse to Mrs. Dixon until the Board of Equalization hearings of August 1949. <br />Assessor Brophy will reply to Mrs. Dixon's letter with his findings. <br />CITY MANAGER ROLISON REQUESTED AUTHORITY TO ADVERTISE SALE OF JUNK AND OBSOLETE EQUIPMENT <br />as required by the Charter. Councilman Warder moved City Manager be so authorized, <br />seconded by Councilman Britschgi and carried. Councilman Granger moved that Fire <br />Chief Lodi and Mechanic McQuiston be appointed to act as appraisers to set a value <br />on the material to be sold. Motion seconded by Councilman McNulty and carried. <br />ASSESSOR BROPHY REQUESTED AUTHORITY TO CORRECT CERTAIN ASSESS14ENTS, in letter dated <br />December 15th, resulting in some increase and:some decreases in the roll, in <br />accordance with Revenue and Taxation Code Section 49862. Request was granted on <br />motion.of Councilman Granger, seconded by Councilman Werder and carried: <br />REQUEST FOR CANCELLATION OF TAXRD ON SCHOOL PROPERTY was submitted by Assessor Brophy. <br />Request originated from Elementary School -District and asked for cancellation of <br />tax bills Nos. 7351 and 7352. Councilman Warder moved cancellation authority, <br />seconded by Councilman Britschgi.and carried. <br />001vIMUNICATION RECEIVED FRO14 JAS. T. O'KEEFE representing Harry Hoefler regarding permit <br />to erect sign in front of his office at 516 El Camino Real. Mr. Hoefler had been <br />denied permit some weeks ago, and request was to reopen the matter for further <br />consideration. It was suggested that the Clerk acknowledge receipt of Mr. O'Keefe's <br />letter asking him to appear at the January 5th meeting at which time he'will be <br />given an opportunity to present his case. <br />TRAFFIC AND SAFETY COMMISSION RECOMMENDATIONS were next considered. Suggestion No. 1. <br />Commission recommended that set -back lines be established at Whipple and El Camino <br />Real intersection to take care of possible realignment of E1 Camino Real to partially <br />straighten out the curve at that point. It was thought this should be done before <br />any building permits might be issued. Recommendation concurred in by motion of <br />Councilman Granger, seconded by Councilman Britschgi, proper authorities to take <br />the necessary action. Motion carried. <br />Recommendation No. 2, suggesting that "stoppingor parking will not be permitted at <br />any time" signs be installed, a police officer be on duty during rush hours, in <br />an effort to speed the traffic from the short street entering Broadway from the <br />S. P. depot. After considerable discussion Councilman Werder moved, seconded'by <br />Councilman Britschgi, that the plan be tried out. City Manager advised signs <br />would be installed as soon as possible. Motion carried, Councilman Granger <br />voting "No:. <br />Recommendation No. 3. Commission suggested installation of traffic lights be revised <br />at Five Points, revamping of all signals from Five Points to northerly city limits <br />including installation of new signals at Whipple Avenue. City Manager reported <br />on his recent conference with Colonel Skeggs of the Highway Commission who notified <br />the City Manager the only signals contemplated in the 1948-49 budget was at Main <br />and Bayshore with possible signals at Chestnut & Bayshore the following year. <br />According to Mr. Skaggs, there is no liklihood of signals being available for <br />Whipple and E1 Camino, nor any revamping of the existing signals at State expense <br />for several years to come. Probable cost of signals at Whipple would be $$10,000, <br />i.i <br />I <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.