My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
BOOK 21_1946-09-23 to 1948-08-09
RedwoodCity
>
City Clerk
>
Minutes
>
1946 to 1948 Book 21
>
BOOK 21_1946-09-23 to 1948-08-09
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/12/2017 1:53:26 PM
Creation date
10/12/2017 1:38:19 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CC Index
CC Index - Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Type
Regular
Agency Type
City Council
Date
9/23/1946
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
517
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
40 <br />tte�supplement agreement to cover the postponing of the installation of <br />sidewalks on the street parallel and adjacent to Woodside Road Copncil- <br />man Armstrong, seconded by Councilman McNulty, that the City Manager be <br />authorized to enter into a supplemental agreement with the Land Development <br />Company, the purpose of which is to provide for the completion of work <br />which is now held up on the street adjacent to and parallel to Woodside <br />Road. Motion passed unanimously. <br />The final map of Hudson Park was presented for approval City Olerk Dodge pre- <br />sented petition signed by property owners on Redwood Avenue and Hudson <br />Street protesting to this subdivision due to the fact that courts are to <br />be built which will back on Redwood Avenue. Mr. C.,M. Armstrong, 643 <br />Redwood Avenue,.represented the petitioners, stating that the building of <br />the courts in this fashion would be detrimental to surrounding property. <br />He stated there was a ditch which ran along the property and which the <br />A petitioners believed could be filled in so that the court could face Red- <br />wood Avenue. City Attorney McCarthy advised that the plan had been ap <br />proved by the Planning Commission in accordance with provisions of the Sub- <br />division Ordinance 0. E. Randlett and David Holder, the subdivider, <br />appeared before the Council. After considerable discussion, Councilman <br />Werder moved, seconded by Councilman Granger, that the matter be referred <br />back to the Planning Commission for consideration at their meeting to- <br />morrow night and a special meeting of the Council be held after receipt <br />of the Planning Commission's recommendation. Motion passed unanimously. <br />Bids on installation of water mains consisting of five jobs were next consid- <br />ered. City Engineer Wilson presented summary of bids received from Fred <br />T Fairey, Underground Construction Company, McGuire and Hester, Harvey <br />Conner and Peter Sorensen, on both a unit and total basis and including <br />a time limit for completion of the work. <br />Job Location <br />No. <br />1 Alameda <br />2 Hudson St. <br />3 Oakdale St <br />4 Red. Terr. <br />5 Red.Manor <br />TOTALS <br />SUMMARY BIDS ON WATER JOBS <br />Harvey Undergound <br />Connor Construct. <br />4933.60 5066.00 <br />2640.00 4400.00 <br />743.05 962.50 <br />3674.40 4584.80 <br />1511.75 2960.00 <br />13502.80 17973.30 <br />Fred <br />Mcquire & <br />Peter <br />Connor <br />Fairey <br />Hester <br />Sorensen <br />ADJ. <br />5927.60 <br />6268.75 <br />5960.25 <br />5316.85 <br />4466.00 <br />5390.00 <br />4752.00 <br />2948.00 <br />1108.80 <br />1636.25 <br />1001.00 <br />800.80 <br />5074.00 <br />4911.00: <br />6929.00 <br />4183.30 <br />2482.90 <br />2472.00 <br />2632.75 <br />1636.40 <br />19059.30 20678.00 21275.00 14885.35 <br />Completion 90 days 60 days 90 days 30 days 40 days <br />City Manager Blom stated that he believed some consideration should be <br />given to the time element in that in two of the jobs time is of the <br />essence - Hudson .Street and Redwood Terrace No. 2 - inasmuch as the pro- <br />jects would be delayed unless the water mains are laid. According to the <br />bids received, Harvey Conner's bid was the low bid by approximately <br />$4b00 and was based on a ninety day completion. Mr Conner had presented <br />to him a letter just before the meeting in which he stated that in check- <br />ing over his bid to determine why it was so much lower than the next low <br />bid he discovered that he had failed to include two items, i. e., backfill <br />and cleanup amounting to 12¢ per lineal foot of trench and bond for faith - <br />r <br />r <br />r. <br />0 <br />r <br />r <br />lu <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.