BOOK 21_1946-09-23 to 1948-08-09

Browse Search

11 intended to enter a protest. 7 9 Affidavit of mailing notices to property owners within 275 feet of the Woments•Club House notifying of c public hearing for a dancing school application by Mildred Buhler, was ordered'filed'on motion of Councilman Armstrong, seconded by Councilman Granger. Motion passed unanimously. , The Mayor called for protestants to the granting of the dancing school permit to Mrs.�Buhler. There were no protests. Councilman Granger moved, seconded by Councilman Werder, that a permit for a dancing school at the Women's Club House be granted Mrs. Mildred.Buhler. Motion passes unanimously. City Attorney McCarthy asked that the report on status of delinquent bonds be carried on the agenda. He reported that he had not had an opportunity to study this matter due to illness. The matter was i ordered placed on the agenda. City Manager Blom reported that work outlined as necessary by the Health Department, Fire Inspector and i a. Building Inspector at the restaurant at 768 Woodside Road had not as yet been completed and asked that the matter of issuing a lioense be carried on the agenda. The matter was ordered carried on the agenda. City Treasurer Dodge reported that in regard to the deduction of^86.41 by the State on the E1 Camino Real and James Avenue project, he had checked the records and discovered that in 1942 on Project 16, sever extension at 5 Points, $86.41 had been unexpended on that project. The money had been retained by the city and included in the gas tax and carried in the treasury since that time. The State did not call attention to this balance until the E1 Camino Real and James Avenue project. Councilman McNulty moved, seconded by Councilman Werder, filing of affidavit of publication of Ordinance No. 568 which amends Ordinance No. 486 and prohibits double parking. Motion passed unanimously. Councilman Granger moved, seconded by Councilman Armstrong, adoption of ordinance No. 568- Under the question, Councilman Warder expressed the opinion that the ordinance prohibits parking on California i Street and he did not believe that was advisable. He believed the matter should be tabled to allow the Planning Commission and Master Planners opportunity to make a report. Councilman Britsohgi also i j questioned no parking on Perry Street. After some discussion and upon advice of the City Attorney that a portion of the ordinance could be deleted, Councilman Granger amended -his motion with the consent of the second to adopt Ordinance No- 568 with the deletion of Section 3- On roll call, ordinance was unanimously adopted. City Attorney McCarthy advised that an error had been made in the description of the annexation of Alden i Subdivision in the resolution which had been published and advised that the resolution would have to be republished. The error was that the whole of the Alden Subdivision had been described rather than a small triangular piece. Councilman Armstrong moved, seconded by Councilman Werder, adoption i of resolution of intention to annex a portion of Alden Subdivision. On roll call, resolution was unanimously adopted. RESOLUTION No. 415 GIVING NOTICE OF PROPOSED ANNEXATION OF TERRITORY HEREINAFTER DESCRIBED TO THE CITY OF REDWOOD CITY, TO BE KNOWN AS ALDEN SUBDIVISION. I WHEREAS, pursuant to the provisions of that certain Act of the Legislature of the State of California, entitled "An act to provide for the alteration of the boundaries of incorporated towns and cities by the annexation of uninhabited territory thereto and for the'inoorporation of such annexed territory in and as a part of such municipality, and for the districting, government and municipal control of such annexed territory, approved May 209 1939 (Stats. of 1939, Chapter 297, page 1567), there was, on the 2d day of December, 1946, filed with the Council of the City of Redwood City, a petition in writing, requesting that the uninhabited territory hereinafter described be annexed to, incorporated and included in and made a part of said City of Redwood City; and YEEREAS the exterior boundaries of said territory are described in said petition, and said territory is contiguous to the limits and boundary of said City of Redwood City, and are partiou- larly described as follows: BEGINNING at the intersection of the Southwesterly line of the Sweeney Ranch as said line is shovm on a map entitled "Map of Subdivisions of Sweeney Ranch near Redwood City, San Mateo County", filed in the office of the County Recorder of San Mateo County, State of California, on June 24, 1898, in Book "C" of Maps at page 36, with the South- easterly boundary line of said City of Redwood City; thence North 20 421 30" west 577.86