|
92.
<br />a -width of only 13 feet and an assessment,against each which would be considered.
<br />confiscatory. He suggested that the assessment on these two parcels,either'be re -
<br />spread over the remaining district or in the reassessment proceedings the assess-
<br />ment district could be enlarged and the assessments spread over the benefitted pro-
<br />perty or the City could retain the bonds. He also objected to several 'assessments
<br />on small portions of lots that have been resubdivided. Councilman Armstrong
<br />stated that the City is willing to take on the assessments on parcels 160. The
<br />City, was reluctant to enlarge the district or spread it over the district.
<br />Mr. Wilson also suggested consolidating assessments on parcels 161, 162, 163 as
<br />they are all commonly owned. Also assessments No. 134, 136, 139, 139 under
<br />common ownership should be consolidated and assessments No. 133, 1350 137 and
<br />140 should be treated similarly. He stated he would write a letter of instruction
<br />to the Engineer. City Manager Blom believed it would be preferable to take the
<br />map back to E. H. Smith, Engineer, for consolidation of small parcels under
<br />common ownership and correct descriptions where inacurate ones were submitted.
<br />Mr. Wilson advised he would submit a resolution correcting the minutes as noted
<br />in his report. There was some discussion as to whether the engineer was respon-
<br />Bible for correcting the assessments. Mr. Wilson stated that the description
<br />on the map is faulty but that spread of assessment is a matter of judgment.
<br />Councilman Armstrong offered resolution directing partial reassessment covering
<br />the total unpaid list and moved its adoption, seconded by Councilman Granger.
<br />On roll call resolution was unanimously adopted with Councilman Swift absent.
<br />RESOLUTION No. 423.
<br />DIRECTING MAKING OF REASSESSMENT RE CERTAIN ASSESSMENTS UNDER
<br />RESOLUTION OF INTENTION No. 1946-1.
<br />RESOLVED, by the City Council of Redwood City, San Mateo County, California,
<br />that
<br />WHEREAS, an assessment and diagram was made and filed with the City Clerk
<br />of said City, pursuant to Resolution of Intention No. 1946-1 adopted by the City
<br />Council of said City on June 1,7, 1946, and which was adopted pursuant to the
<br />provisions of Aritcle II A of Ordinance No- 333, designated "Redwood City Im-
<br />provement Procedure Ordinance", as amended, and said assessment was confirmed
<br />by said City Council on July 19, 1946; and
<br />WHEREAS, certain of said assessments, to -wit: Assessments Numbers 1, 2, 7,
<br />E, 98 10, 16, 179 19, 20, 210 229 239 24 255, 261 27,28s 299 30, 3195.,_86s 3,-34, 359
<br />36, 37, 39, 56, 57, 56, 590 66, 62, 630 64, b5, 67, 68, 70, 71, 84; 87,
<br />�`8 90, 92, 98, 99, 1000 101, 102, 103, 104, 109, 109, 1102 115, 117, 119, 123,
<br />124, 127, 1299 129, 131, 133, 135, 137, 140, 141, 1420 143, 1 , 1459 1460 1479
<br />1490 149, 155, 156, 157, 159, 16o, 161, 162, 163, 1660 169, 169 and 170, were
<br />irregularly levied, and are not enforceable through the curative provisions in
<br />relation thereto;
<br />NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED, that
<br />1, Edwin H. Smith make and'file with this City Council'a reassessment of
<br />all parcels of property, the former assessments upon which under said Resolution
<br />of Intention are designated upon said assessment and diagram as above set forth;'
<br />2. Said reassessment being a partial one only, it shall not be necessary
<br />for the diagram to show any other lots or parcels of real property than those
<br />covered by such partial reassessment;
<br />3. The reassessment shall assess upon*and against each of the lots, pieces
<br />or parcels of land contained therein an amount arrived at as follows.: The
<br />benefits derived; or to be derived, by each of said lots, pieces or parcels of
<br />land, from the work or improvement, estimated as of the date of the filing of
<br />the original assessment with said City Council, sahll first be listed. The
<br />total of such reassessment, however, shall not exceed the cost and expenses of
<br />the work and improvement.' Said reassessment shall refer to the original assess-
<br />ment filed, giving the date of filing said original assessment and state that
<br />it is made pursuant to the order of this City Council, and shall be accompanied
<br />by a diagram showing the lots to be reassessed and their relation to the work.
<br />IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that said reassessment, when completed, shall be
<br />presented to this City Council.
<br />E. I
<br />04-
<br />
|