Laserfiche WebLink
O <br />1 <br />ATTEST: <br />RALPH S. DODGE <br />Clerk of the City of Redwood City <br />I hereby* approve the foregoing resolution <br />this 4th day of October, 1949• <br />W. M. WERDER <br />Mayor of the City of Redwood City <br />325 <br />TRAFFIC FACT FINDING COMMITTEE MADE A STUDY OF REQUEST BY OLD MILL FLOWER SHOP FOR A ONE-HOUR PARKING LIMIT <br />IN FRONT OF THEIR PIA CE OF BUSINESS and recommended installation of such from flower shop to Broadway <br />on northeastern side of El Canino Real. Question of enforcement camp up, however it was desired to <br />eliminate all day commuter parking and spot runs could be made on this strip. Partial opinion was <br />that it was not right to take all the space to Broadway where it was not needed and that previously <br />the Council had turned down a similar request. Councilman Morgan moved this be referred again,to the <br />Traf£ic,Fact Finding Committee with Council comments, seconded by Councilman Swift and carried. <br />EXTENSION OF FRANKLIN STREET THROUGH BUTCHER FIELD TO JAMES AVENUE. Councilman Morgan stated the committee <br />had gone as far as it could go without money and there was no money to condemn this property in order <br />to proceed and Southern Pacific Company would not give the property to the City. <br />CITY ATTORNEY STATED THERE WAS A NEWAECTION TO THE VEHICLE CODE, EFFECTIVE October 1, 1949 in regard to <br />parking signs along a highway requiring written approval from the Division of Highways. He would <br />check on it and report. <br />CITY ENGINEER JAIN WAS TO CHECK ON SIGN IN FRONT OF OLD MISSION CARPET HOUSE: Councilman Granger thought <br />it was a 'To Parking" sign. It.should be for "One Hour"* <br />COUNCILMAN BRITSCHGI WONDERED WHY 3 INTERSECTIONS ON BROADWAY HAD A "NO U TURN'" and none at the 4th. Re- <br />ferred to the Traffic Fact Finding Committee, <br />CITY CLERK WAS AUTHORIZED TO ACCEPT THE FOLLOWING 8 DEEDS on motion of Councilman Holmquist, seconded by <br />Councilman Morgan and carried. They were for Ranzulo, Hart,Caton, OtKernal, succi, Brumfield & <br />c <br />Hanson, Plath, Grant, Plath ready to be signed, and the others were in the Title Company, <br />RESOLUTION 793L STANLff-WESTGATE IMPROVEMENTS WAS OFFERED and mored for adoption by Councilman Britschgi, <br />seconded by Councilman Morgan and carried on roll call. <br />RES 0LUTI0N N0. 791 <br />NOW, THEREFO.R.E, IT IS HEREBY RESOLVED by the City Council of -the City of Redwood City, as follows., <br />i <br />RESOLUTION OF PUBLIC CONVENIENCE AND NECESSITY <br />STANLEY WESTGATE <br />' <br />if{ <br />? ' <br />WHEREAS; on the 5th day of July, 1949, the City Council of the City of Redwood City adopted <br />a Resolution of Preliminary Determination to make public improvementVin the City of Redwood City, <br />p <br />being Resolution No. 728 of said Council, to construct certain public improvements more particularly <br />described therein, and did fix therein July 18, 1949 as the time and place when and where any and <br />i <br />all persons interested may appear and show cause, if any they have, why the City/ ouncil should not <br />find and determine that the public convenience and necessity require the improvements described and <br />{ <br />referred to in said resolution without compliance with the Special Assessment, Investigation, Limits - <br />tion and Majority Protest Act of 1931; and <br />i <br />WHEREAS notice of the adoption of said resolution and of said time and place of kering was given <br />by the City Clerk by publication and posting for the time and in the manner provided in said resolution <br />4 <br />and Ordinance No. 515 of the City of Redwood City, as appears from the affidavits on file with the <br />' <br />Citytlerk;; and <br />} <br />WHEREAS no persons objecting to the undertaking of said proceedings without first complying with <br />f <br />the provisions of said Specia:�Issessment, Investigation, Limitation, and Majority Protest Act of 1931 <br />f <br />have filed -written objections thereto with the City Clerk at or before the time fixed for.said hearing <br />t ` <br />by persons interested, owning -or having an interest in real property within thf(proposed assessment <br />districts bearing their signatures, a description of their property, and a statement of the n4tl9re <br />of their interest therein- and <br />WHEREAS alhersons have been given an opportunity to be and were fully heard, and said Council <br />4 C <br />has duly considered any and all objections and protests made, and the said proposed improvements and <br />�. <br />the public convenience and necessity for m!aeing the same; <br />NOW, THEREFO.R.E, IT IS HEREBY RESOLVED by the City Council of -the City of Redwood City, as follows., <br />