BOOK 22_1948-08-17 to 1950-05-15

Browse Search

u of the properties for public utilities. Councilman Granger had moved that the Cit73 9 3 Engineer find costs to correct condition in an effort to cooperate with the residents, seconded by Councilman Britschgi, but later withdrew the motion with the consent of the second. He then moved that the City Engineer find costs and approach the County Eng- ineering Department in effort to have them share the responsibility, 'and motion was seconded by Councilman Britschgi and carried. Mr. Herman was to be notified of the outcome. ADOPTION OF OFFICIAL PLAN LINES FOR A FUTURE STREET ALONG THE PULGAS LINE BETVIEEN.WHIPPLE AVENUE AIM THE SAN CARLOS CITY LIMITS was recommended by the Planning Commission. Cozen cilman Spillers moved that the time be set for public hearing, seconded by.Councilman Morgan, and carried. PLANNING COMMISSION RECOh'MENDED DENIAL NORMAN Mac DONALS. to resubdivide a portion.of Lot 9, Block A, Vera Avenue Villas (corner Vera and Adamns) because of insufficient area for the three lots requested. Councilman Morgan moved approval of Planning Commission recommendation to deny application, seconded by Councilman Holmquist,'and carried. PLANNING COM1.4ISSIO1i RECOMMENiDED APPROVAL OF F. W. FABIAN TO RESUBDIVIDE Lot 5, Block 13 New High School Acres. Councilman Britschgi recommended approval of recommendation, seconded by Councilman Spillers, and carried. PLANNING COIv`MISSION RECOMMENDED APPROVAL OF NICOLL AND COMPANY TO RESUBDIVIDE Lots 6, 7, 8, and 9, of IV. V'. & M. Subdivision into three lots. Councilman Britschgi moved approval of recommendation, seconded by Councilman Morgan, and carried. 10 PLANNING C0Rt1+IISSION RECOIuMENDED APPROVAL OF PETITION OF RICHARD DELUCCHI TO REZONE Lots 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, and a portion of 172 Block 5, Tract 559 from R-2 to C-l-H,subject to the condition that a non -access planting strip be dedicated for a planting screen along Florence Avenue. Surrounding property owners, seemed to be in accord with the rezoning. M. J. KING, INC., submitted a protest, signed by B. I. Lusk, stating they, had no knowledge of the pending reclassification and requested that the application be_re-referred to the Planning Commission so that they might have an opportunity to be heard and present evidence. They had completed 200 homes in this immediate vicinity and objected to the change from residential to commercial zoning. Councilman Granger moved that the application be re-referred to the Planning Commission along with.the communication of M. J. King Inc., seconded by Councilman Morgan. Mr. Frank Ingersol appeared for Mr. Delucchi stating that about a year ago the first application was made to the Planning Commission and it was denied at that time. Two or three months ago the Improvement Club asked that lar. Delucchi try again. Notices of the hearing were sent to,all within a radius of 500 feet. He claimed that Mr. King owned property in the County, not in the City. The Council did not question Mr._Ingersol's information, however, the motion carried. ENGINEERING FEES - SEWAGE TREATMENT PLANT. City Attorney Currie submitted an opinion.on this in which the District Attorney also concurred. Contract *ith Frost & Brian,pro- vided a base amount each for 20 foot piles, which was the estimated length, and .a unit price per foot for additional lengths over and above said 20 feet. The actual length of the piles driven was 60 feet and the contractor was being paid in accordance there-' with, resulting in a cost of 044,880 in excess of the estimate. It was their opinion that the engineer could properly claim 4%. of this additional money, or $1795.20. Councilman Granger moved that this amount be paid to Frost to Brian on recommendation of