|
Regulations of the State Utilities Commission, and which if included would have 475
<br />substantially increased the annual deficit.
<br />In reviewing the record of the past however, it is revealed that substantial
<br />losses to the City in the operation of the Emerald Lake Water System have been the
<br />rule rather than the exception.
<br />Under date of February 1939, Mr. C. L. Dimmitt, then City Manager and former
<br />City Engineer and -Superintendent of the Water Department, in his history of the
<br />Emerald Lake Water System stated: "The total operating expense plus borrowed funds
<br />for capital investment is in the amount of $98,023.63, and the total revenue derived
<br />$792605.93, leaving an indebtedness to the Redwood City Water Department of 618,47.70.1'
<br />that.....
<br />"Rates for the Emerald Lake District should provide a revenue to cover operating
<br />expenses, provide an annual sum for money advanced and set aside an additional sum for
<br />capital expenditures for future extensions and betterments."
<br />I wish to emphasize the fact that Mr. Dimmitt's statements are more especially
<br />true today for the reason that the number of consumers has increased from 392 in 1939
<br />to 1008 at present, thereby greatly overloading the system and complicating the
<br />distribution problem.
<br />While it is not considered economically feasible to increase rates sufficiently
<br />to finance all necessary improvements from current revenues within a reasonable
<br />period, it is imperative for the protection of existing consumers in the entire area,
<br />that at least the mai�»pnly line and storage facies ie be maintained -ix a manner
<br />that will insure a continuous and uninterrupted source sufficient to supply numerous
<br />st�Orag@t _arks locat-e�L_at _v.Aiozzs, _distribution ] euels.
<br />It is apparent therefore, due to the fact that neither the Water Department nor
<br />the consumers themselves are prepared to undertake long term financing due to the
<br />recent defeat of the formation of a public utility district, and the fact that this
<br />area is located outside the City, that any major improvement or expansion of distri-
<br />bution line leading from storage tanks and reservoirs to individual consumers, due to
<br />the expenditure involved, must be deferred until such time as some way can be found
<br />to assess this cost to the property directly benefitted by such improvements.
<br />In the meantime as a matter of practical necessity and for the protection of
<br />existing consumers, it is vitally essential that no new consumers be added to the
<br />distribution lines which are already greatly overloaded.
<br />In order to provide funds necessary for maintenance and operation and the
<br />improvement of supply lines and storage facilities for Emerald Lake and other areas
<br />outside the corporate limits of the City, it is recommended that the following rate
<br />schedules and operating rules and regulations be made effective as of May 1, 1950;
<br />(1) The rates to be charged and collected for water supplied by the Redwood
<br />City Water Department to consumers OUTSIDE the limits of the City of Redwood
<br />City, where no pumping or other extra expense is required to provide such ser-
<br />vice,' are' hereby'fixed_as follows:
<br />For water delivered, based on monthly meter readings:
<br />(a)
<br />Also, in response to a demand
<br />1939, Iver. Dimmitt further stated, "the
<br />for
<br />a reduction in rates, under date of November 17,
<br />Water Department cannot afford any reductions
<br />3,300
<br />of the gross income derived during
<br />the
<br />past year unless we adopt such a radical and
<br />(b)
<br />inconceivable policy as to serve an
<br />outside district at the expense of either the
<br />next
<br />water consumer or taxpayers within
<br />the
<br />corporate limits."
<br />I wish to emphasize the fact that Mr. Dimmitt's statements are more especially
<br />true today for the reason that the number of consumers has increased from 392 in 1939
<br />to 1008 at present, thereby greatly overloading the system and complicating the
<br />distribution problem.
<br />While it is not considered economically feasible to increase rates sufficiently
<br />to finance all necessary improvements from current revenues within a reasonable
<br />period, it is imperative for the protection of existing consumers in the entire area,
<br />that at least the mai�»pnly line and storage facies ie be maintained -ix a manner
<br />that will insure a continuous and uninterrupted source sufficient to supply numerous
<br />st�Orag@t _arks locat-e�L_at _v.Aiozzs, _distribution ] euels.
<br />It is apparent therefore, due to the fact that neither the Water Department nor
<br />the consumers themselves are prepared to undertake long term financing due to the
<br />recent defeat of the formation of a public utility district, and the fact that this
<br />area is located outside the City, that any major improvement or expansion of distri-
<br />bution line leading from storage tanks and reservoirs to individual consumers, due to
<br />the expenditure involved, must be deferred until such time as some way can be found
<br />to assess this cost to the property directly benefitted by such improvements.
<br />In the meantime as a matter of practical necessity and for the protection of
<br />existing consumers, it is vitally essential that no new consumers be added to the
<br />distribution lines which are already greatly overloaded.
<br />In order to provide funds necessary for maintenance and operation and the
<br />improvement of supply lines and storage facilities for Emerald Lake and other areas
<br />outside the corporate limits of the City, it is recommended that the following rate
<br />schedules and operating rules and regulations be made effective as of May 1, 1950;
<br />(1) The rates to be charged and collected for water supplied by the Redwood
<br />City Water Department to consumers OUTSIDE the limits of the City of Redwood
<br />City, where no pumping or other extra expense is required to provide such ser-
<br />vice,' are' hereby'fixed_as follows:
<br />For water delivered, based on monthly meter readings:
<br />(a)
<br />For
<br />the
<br />first
<br />3,300
<br />cubic
<br />feet . . . . . . . . . ..40
<br />(b)
<br />For
<br />the
<br />next
<br />30,000
<br />cubic
<br />feet . . . . . . . . . .
<br />.35
<br />(c)
<br />For
<br />all
<br />above
<br />33,300
<br />cubic
<br />feet . . . . . . . . . .
<br />.30
<br />Provided, however, that the minimum amount for each month to be charged and
<br />collected for service through a water meter shall be as follows:
<br />(a) For 5/8 inch meter . . . . . . . . • • • • . . . .N$2.25
<br />( b ) For 3/4 inch meter . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
<br />(c) For 1 inch meter . . . . . . . . . . . . 0 . . . 3.75
<br />(d) For 1-1/2 inch meter . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6.20
<br />(e) For 2 inch meter . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10.00
<br />f19.00
<br />f ( f ) For inch meter
<br />(g) For inch meter . . . . . . . . . . 30.00
<br />(h) For i inch meter . . . . . . . . . . . . 57.00
<br />}
<br />i (2) EMERALD LAKE DISTRICT. The rates to be charged and collected for water
<br />distributed and supplied by the Redwood City Water Department to consumers
<br />OUTSIDE the limits of the City of Redwood City and where PUMPING or other extra
<br />expense is required to provide such service, are hereby fixed as follows:
<br />For water delivered, based on monthly readings:
<br />(a) For the first 1,000 cubic feet . . . . . 55 cents per 100
<br />(b) For the next 2,000 cubic feet . . . . . 50 cents per 100
<br />(c) For all above 3,000 cubic feet . . . . . . . . 5 cents per 100
<br />Provided, however, that the minimum amount for each month to be charged and
<br />collected for service shall be as follows:
<br />F a
<br />
|