Laserfiche WebLink
Regulations of the State Utilities Commission, and which if included would have 475 <br />substantially increased the annual deficit. <br />In reviewing the record of the past however, it is revealed that substantial <br />losses to the City in the operation of the Emerald Lake Water System have been the <br />rule rather than the exception. <br />Under date of February 1939, Mr. C. L. Dimmitt, then City Manager and former <br />City Engineer and -Superintendent of the Water Department, in his history of the <br />Emerald Lake Water System stated: "The total operating expense plus borrowed funds <br />for capital investment is in the amount of $98,023.63, and the total revenue derived <br />$792605.93, leaving an indebtedness to the Redwood City Water Department of 618,47.70.1' <br />that..... <br />"Rates for the Emerald Lake District should provide a revenue to cover operating <br />expenses, provide an annual sum for money advanced and set aside an additional sum for <br />capital expenditures for future extensions and betterments." <br />I wish to emphasize the fact that Mr. Dimmitt's statements are more especially <br />true today for the reason that the number of consumers has increased from 392 in 1939 <br />to 1008 at present, thereby greatly overloading the system and complicating the <br />distribution problem. <br />While it is not considered economically feasible to increase rates sufficiently <br />to finance all necessary improvements from current revenues within a reasonable <br />period, it is imperative for the protection of existing consumers in the entire area, <br />that at least the mai�»pnly line and storage facies ie be maintained -ix a manner <br />that will insure a continuous and uninterrupted source sufficient to supply numerous <br />st�Orag@t _arks locat-e�L_at _v.Aiozzs, _distribution ] euels. <br />It is apparent therefore, due to the fact that neither the Water Department nor <br />the consumers themselves are prepared to undertake long term financing due to the <br />recent defeat of the formation of a public utility district, and the fact that this <br />area is located outside the City, that any major improvement or expansion of distri- <br />bution line leading from storage tanks and reservoirs to individual consumers, due to <br />the expenditure involved, must be deferred until such time as some way can be found <br />to assess this cost to the property directly benefitted by such improvements. <br />In the meantime as a matter of practical necessity and for the protection of <br />existing consumers, it is vitally essential that no new consumers be added to the <br />distribution lines which are already greatly overloaded. <br />In order to provide funds necessary for maintenance and operation and the <br />improvement of supply lines and storage facilities for Emerald Lake and other areas <br />outside the corporate limits of the City, it is recommended that the following rate <br />schedules and operating rules and regulations be made effective as of May 1, 1950; <br />(1) The rates to be charged and collected for water supplied by the Redwood <br />City Water Department to consumers OUTSIDE the limits of the City of Redwood <br />City, where no pumping or other extra expense is required to provide such ser- <br />vice,' are' hereby'fixed_as follows: <br />For water delivered, based on monthly meter readings: <br />(a) <br />Also, in response to a demand <br />1939, Iver. Dimmitt further stated, "the <br />for <br />a reduction in rates, under date of November 17, <br />Water Department cannot afford any reductions <br />3,300 <br />of the gross income derived during <br />the <br />past year unless we adopt such a radical and <br />(b) <br />inconceivable policy as to serve an <br />outside district at the expense of either the <br />next <br />water consumer or taxpayers within <br />the <br />corporate limits." <br />I wish to emphasize the fact that Mr. Dimmitt's statements are more especially <br />true today for the reason that the number of consumers has increased from 392 in 1939 <br />to 1008 at present, thereby greatly overloading the system and complicating the <br />distribution problem. <br />While it is not considered economically feasible to increase rates sufficiently <br />to finance all necessary improvements from current revenues within a reasonable <br />period, it is imperative for the protection of existing consumers in the entire area, <br />that at least the mai�»pnly line and storage facies ie be maintained -ix a manner <br />that will insure a continuous and uninterrupted source sufficient to supply numerous <br />st�Orag@t _arks locat-e�L_at _v.Aiozzs, _distribution ] euels. <br />It is apparent therefore, due to the fact that neither the Water Department nor <br />the consumers themselves are prepared to undertake long term financing due to the <br />recent defeat of the formation of a public utility district, and the fact that this <br />area is located outside the City, that any major improvement or expansion of distri- <br />bution line leading from storage tanks and reservoirs to individual consumers, due to <br />the expenditure involved, must be deferred until such time as some way can be found <br />to assess this cost to the property directly benefitted by such improvements. <br />In the meantime as a matter of practical necessity and for the protection of <br />existing consumers, it is vitally essential that no new consumers be added to the <br />distribution lines which are already greatly overloaded. <br />In order to provide funds necessary for maintenance and operation and the <br />improvement of supply lines and storage facilities for Emerald Lake and other areas <br />outside the corporate limits of the City, it is recommended that the following rate <br />schedules and operating rules and regulations be made effective as of May 1, 1950; <br />(1) The rates to be charged and collected for water supplied by the Redwood <br />City Water Department to consumers OUTSIDE the limits of the City of Redwood <br />City, where no pumping or other extra expense is required to provide such ser- <br />vice,' are' hereby'fixed_as follows: <br />For water delivered, based on monthly meter readings: <br />(a) <br />For <br />the <br />first <br />3,300 <br />cubic <br />feet . . . . . . . . . ..40 <br />(b) <br />For <br />the <br />next <br />30,000 <br />cubic <br />feet . . . . . . . . . . <br />.35 <br />(c) <br />For <br />all <br />above <br />33,300 <br />cubic <br />feet . . . . . . . . . . <br />.30 <br />Provided, however, that the minimum amount for each month to be charged and <br />collected for service through a water meter shall be as follows: <br />(a) For 5/8 inch meter . . . . . . . . • • • • . . . .N$2.25 <br />( b ) For 3/4 inch meter . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . <br />(c) For 1 inch meter . . . . . . . . . . . . 0 . . . 3.75 <br />(d) For 1-1/2 inch meter . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6.20 <br />(e) For 2 inch meter . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10.00 <br />f19.00 <br />f ( f ) For inch meter <br />(g) For inch meter . . . . . . . . . . 30.00 <br />(h) For i inch meter . . . . . . . . . . . . 57.00 <br />} <br />i (2) EMERALD LAKE DISTRICT. The rates to be charged and collected for water <br />distributed and supplied by the Redwood City Water Department to consumers <br />OUTSIDE the limits of the City of Redwood City and where PUMPING or other extra <br />expense is required to provide such service, are hereby fixed as follows: <br />For water delivered, based on monthly readings: <br />(a) For the first 1,000 cubic feet . . . . . 55 cents per 100 <br />(b) For the next 2,000 cubic feet . . . . . 50 cents per 100 <br />(c) For all above 3,000 cubic feet . . . . . . . . 5 cents per 100 <br />Provided, however, that the minimum amount for each month to be charged and <br />collected for service shall be as follows: <br />F a <br />