My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
BOOK 22_1948-08-17 to 1950-05-15
RedwoodCity
>
City Clerk
>
Minutes
>
1948 to 1950 Book 22
>
BOOK 22_1948-08-17 to 1950-05-15
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/12/2017 2:56:33 PM
Creation date
10/12/2017 2:39:12 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CC Index
CC Index - Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Type
Regular
Agency Type
City Council
Date
8/17/1948
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
513
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
476 <br />(a) For 5/8 inch meter . . . . . . . . . . . 3.30 f <br />(b) For 3/4 inch meter . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 85 <br />(c) For 1 inch meter . . I.. . . . . . . . . . �}.1.f.0 <br />i' <br />(3) NEW SERVICES. The Redwood City Water Department reserves the right to f <br />determine the size of meter and service connections. No new service con- <br />nections shall be added to any existing overloaded distribution lines. t <br />Normally, 20 consumers shall constitute a maximum number of services con- <br />nected to any 2 inch distribution line or its equivalent. <br />(4) EXTENSION OF NEW MAINS. Where no mains exist new mains will be extended <br />at cost of consumer or applicant, provided pressure and supply are adequate <br />to warrant such extension, as determined by the Water Department. All <br />installations to be and remain the property of the City. <br />(5) OTHER RULES AND REGULATIONS. That all other rules and regulations of <br />the Redwood City Water Department not in conflict with the above, shall <br />apply to the Emerald Lake Area and all other outside consumers. <br />It is estimated that if approved the suggested rates should produce a net <br />surplus earning of between $10,000 and $12,000 per year above the bare cost of <br />operation, as applied to the Emerald Lake District. I <br />In other words, the present annual gross revenue of approximately %L8,000 <br />in this area would be increased approximately 25%, or to a total of about <br />$60 000. Therefore the present average monthly bill of $4.00 would be increased <br />to 65.00, based on 1000 existing consumers. <br />In order to avoid any future misunderstanding it is again emphasized that IT <br />current revenues, even with this proposed increase, will not provide sufficient <br />funds for the improvement of distribution facilities affecting individual con- <br />sumers. However, in the event an improved distribution service is demanded, it <br />would be my recommendation that, if practical, the City furnish such improvements <br />at cost and without profit, providing that rates can be sufficiently increased, <br />or the individual consumers directly benefitted are willing to advance no <br />necessary funds to pay all out of pocket expenses. <br />Briefly, I feel that the City should be prepared to furnish any type and <br />quality of service that the citizens in the Emerald Lake area desire and are <br />willing and able to pay for. I do not feel however that the City is obligated <br />-to provide such improvements at the expense of either the taxpayers or water <br />consumers of Redwood City. <br />Attention is also called to the fact that recent demands of the National <br />Board of Fire Underwriters will require a large expenditure to enlarge water <br />mains within the City, the penalty for undue delay being increased insurance <br />premiums. <br />Your favorable and immediate consideration of the above recommendations <br />are therefore urgently requested. <br />Respectfully submitted, <br />E. A. ROLISON 1 <br />EAR:hm City Manager <br />JOHN HARTLEY, 730 Katherine Street, rug cleaning business. An appeal was made by <br />Wayne R. Millington, Attorney for Mr. Hartley in regard to recent order of the <br />Council requiring him to desist from rug cleaning business in First Residential <br />District, because of protest by neighbors. Mr. Millington stated he had a permit <br />from 3 to 5 years and thought he was entitled'to a hearing by the Planning Com- <br />mission and asked that this be placed on the agenda for the next meeting to give <br />him an opportunity to'present more of the facts at that time. Councilman Morgan <br />I_ <br />moved this be carried:on the agenda, seconded by Councilman Werder. Councilman J <br />Granger stated this had always been an R-1 District. r <br />I� <br />REPORT ON BIDS FOR SIDEWALKS, ALAMEDA DE LAS PULGAS and HOPKINS AVENUE. Mr. C. 0. <br />Bodenhamer submitted low bid of 3105.70 and P. Sorensen $3130.55. The total <br />submitted by Mr. Sorensen was'$3310.55, but was an error in addition. City f� <br />Engineer Jain stated neither he, Building Inspector Duncan nor Water Superinten- <br />dent H. L. Winter knew of Mr. Bodenhamer. Councilman Holmquist stated he was a <br />resident of Redwood City for many years and was well known, had constructed <br />bridges and specialized in concrete work. Councilman Spillers moved this be <br />carried on agenda to give City Engineer Jain time to check further, seconded by <br />Councilman Morgan, and carried. <br />I <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.