My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
BOOK 22_1948-08-17 to 1950-05-15
RedwoodCity
>
City Clerk
>
Minutes
>
1948 to 1950 Book 22
>
BOOK 22_1948-08-17 to 1950-05-15
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/12/2017 2:56:33 PM
Creation date
10/12/2017 2:39:12 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CC Index
CC Index - Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Type
Regular
Agency Type
City Council
Date
8/17/1948
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
513
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
484 <br />PERMIT ANIMAT EXHIBIT. Mr. Frank E. Peters requested permit to show for 3 days, May <br />5, 6, and 7th, which was on Sunday. The show was to be held on Broadway off <br />Main Street, Mrs. Dixon's property. There would be no seats as it was a walk- <br />through show. City Collector Perrin was called upon in regard to this and he <br />stated a regular fee of $35 per day would be charged but the City Ordinance did <br />not permit -showing of carnivals or circuses on Sunday. Councilman Jierder moved <br />that the permit be granted subject to approval of proper authorities, seconded <br />by Councilman Morgan, and carried. City Attorney was to advise Mr. Perrin with <br />regard to the Sunday shows and Mr. Peters was to contact Mr. Perrin. <br />JOHN HARTLEy, 730 KATHERINE AVENUE, regarding Cleaning and Repair Business. Attorney <br />Wayne R. Millington appeared for Mr. Hartley stating he had been operating for <br />four years under use permit granted by the Planning Commission under Ordinance <br />460 which was repealed by Ordinance 600. The Council had ordered Mr. Hartley <br />to discontinue his business in theis R-1 District within 30 days as of Council <br />meeting April 3rd. It was Mr. Millington's understanding that if a use permit <br />was in existence at the time of adoption of Ordinance 600 it could not be re- <br />voked except after certain proceedings and his client would be entitled to a <br />hearing before the Planning Commission. People around him were willing that he <br />continue, the protest came from across the street when people were moving in and <br />out and there was some confusion on account of large van's or trucks, but there <br />had been no such congestion since. Mr. Millington asked that the Council let <br />him continue until expiration of the lease. He had recently leased the house <br />�I from Mrs. Metvin for two years, had two sewing machines that were used in the <br />I business, but did not live there. City Collector Perrin presented a record <br />showing license fees from February 27th, 1948. Mayor Britschgi suggested this <br />be put over to the next meeting of May 8th, City Attorney Currie to check and <br />E <br />l make a report at that time. <br />STREET IMPROVEMENTS - WHIP.PLE AVENUE EXTENSION. City Engineer Jain submitted a <br />I report after meeting with the Hospital Board on Wednesday, April 19th. They <br />would dedicate a strip 24 feet in width along the northerly side of Whipple <br />if <br />Avenue. No parking would be permitted along the Hospital side of this street <br />If in order that the could be constructed 7 feet closer to the street and still <br />permit an ultimate four -lane boulevard to connect with Edgewood Road at some <br />furture date. The Hospital Board approved paving a full 21 feet between the <br />curb and the proposed centerline andthe installation of curbs and gutters and <br />f the construction of sidewalks adjacent to the curb. In order to have the street <br />it improved during the summer months and prior to opening of the hospital, it was <br />recommended that the County Engineer be given authority to prepare plans and <br />specifications on the project in order to accelerate the project and because <br />the entire right-of-way now lay within unincorporated territory. It was <br />doubtful whether the project could be completed within the time requested due <br />to other assessment districts now in planning stage or under construction. This <br />would leave City Engineer's office free to proceed with the Alameda Street <br />improvements as a separate project. Approval of recommendation was requested. <br />After the letter was read City Engineer Jain stated that Mr. Wilson from the <br />County Engineer's office had contacted him and their office was quite cool to <br />the idea of doing the street project. Councilman Spillers moved that <br />0 <br />b <br />!r <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.