Laserfiche WebLink
Crdlna <br />roval of minutes of regular <br />�40 an moved app ICA`iICF <br />Councilman Morgan <br />APPROVAL OF MINUTES AS MAILED. Aust 28th, seconded by council. pPpt <br />J i August 21st and xegular adjourned meeting AL,US9 <br />meeting:, <br />!. <br />{? Priebe <br />man Jones and carried. AVENt'E,-Councilmen Herkenr and <br />1 {; <br />REAS ESTATE CO REPORT RE PROPOSED EXTENSION OAK resent <br />requested sewer and water° easaznent, Oak Avenue run - <br />S <br />Spillers. Mr- M• L. Hildreth had req mercha <br />treat right-of-way. City Engineer <br />p <br />{ �� ,; moved <br />} ;.I EJ ning into Hudson Street and offetradaoeasamentet through City propety (Hawes Park) for <br />City <br />( suggested that the seconc <br />Jain had sugg committee recommended that a revocable <br />„ ,, . { The comm � <br />Il easement through Mr. Hildrethts property were e <br />it ' ter utilities provided Mr. Hildreth would give the <br />".' othere <br />permit be granted for sewer and water <br />rice or at an appraised price at present <br />City an option for LO years at an agreed p the vc <br />1 also reported on contact with Mr. Hildreth that <br />{ ,',,� values for Oak Avenue extension. aY noted <br />give the City a 10 year option at an agxesd price after the appraisals <br />,!, '•',; he agreed to natter <br />in return for permit for water,* Councila?an <br />Jones moved that complete report be accept gritsc <br />an appraisals, seconded by Councilman <br />ed approving recommendation subject to meeting and re <br />a` <br />Royer and carried. <br />PiAilII1C G( <br />and Spillers. COunc 11man Morgan said the <br />j' RENT CONTROL COt0IIT'PEE REPORT, -Councilman Morgan ROAD E <br />should gat together and the public should be advised of such a mating <br />committee s x lines <br />through the press. petiti <br />CIVIL SERVICE COMMITTEE REPORT ON MEETING WITH PERSONNEL BOARD. <br />Councilman Granger and was pr <br />i'. Jonas. Relative to salary of Police 'Lieutenant the committee reported that this could ' til at <br />This was stillunder considers. <br />be dropped from the Council agenda for the time being. was in <br />ea ort would be ready later. Councilman Morgan movo, <br />tion by the Personnel Board an <br />d a r set tc <br />•� this be placed on the agenda far the first meeting in October, <br />October 2nd, secondedimprov <br />d carriedby Councilman Granger an. <br />to wor <br />THE BENCH COMMITTEE REPORT, -Councilmen He and Spillers. One of the gentleman who <br />had submitted bid was not available for the committee meeting, s o no report could be circul <br />sentin <br />made at this time. Placed on agenda for next regualr meeting. and re <br />LETTER FROM Prfft. E. WILSON, KIRKBRIDGE, WILSON, HARZFELD & WALLACE, WAS READ RELATIVE TO TS andwour <br />BROADVtAY-MARSHALL PROJECT. A proposed form of an ordinance was submitted along with <br />_i Counci <br />the bttar, (amending the Redwood City Improvement Procedure Ordinance X333) for the 0011- <br />(amending <br />on ' <br />by Cat <br />I { j <br />sideration of the Council, Ad.th the hope that it would be introduced on this date with <br />the view of it being studied between now and the follavring•Monday night, September llta <br />t t In the letter Mr. Wilson stated that the ordinaAce would make it possible for the City <br />}t to finance whatever share of the bridge or other improvements involved in the pro- <br />' ! �+ �•i, ject that the City deemed advisee le, with serial bonds payabL in one or more <br />years <br />r j from an annual special tax or assessment levy on the assessed valuation of land and k <br />a <br />improvements within the assessment district. There would be no diagram ar assessment, <br />entin <br />but rather only a district boudary. This boundary could be coterminous with the <br />City or consist of a lesser part thereof. Though the ordinance might not ultimately i <br />be adapted, Mr. Wilson thought it advisable to introduce it at this time, for if <br />adopted it would not be effective for thirty days from next J�Ionday and they would have <br />to wait until then to change and modify the present assessment proceedings under the <br />tjo r <br />ordinance. Councilman Granger wished to xnow if Mr. Milson were trying to Epply this <br />generally as an ordinance to live longer than the project. He replied that he <br />ih <br />11 I i}i,d <br />tried to make a law more useful than the immediate project. Councilman Royer °fere <br />.. l <br />introduction of ordinance Council to study, seconded by Councilman Jones and married <br />