BOOK 23_1950-05-15 to 1952-04-21

Browse Search

TRI 1 !• a Y and f t?18 storm waters could be otherwise diverted. Mr. Jain had made afield stud ert could not serve all property and he worke P P Y d.out easement through Schulba prop Y to o in back of Oak Ridge Tract or in frdnt of Seely property. two alternate plans, g f'' ? I'; ' i'; 1 For the storm drain they would have to build about 500 ft of drain in the Canyon Road area and construct another line up Glenwood which would empty into creek about one •I block up, and this would be less expensive. Drainage problem had existed for the Jain thought it should be made a condition of annexation, .t last several years and Mr. g +! i' " Mrs. Schulba objected being taxed for drainage ; ;j Plans were partly completed. g of the / 1 'i Murphy tract below them. City Engineer stated this affected about 4 lots in Murphy Tract. Mr. Jain showed plans to Council member and Councilman Spillers moved that d specifications as indicated on map, seconded City Engineer proceed with plans an aI'I by Councilman Morgan. Councilman Royer thought that storm drainage should be brougt before the people when applications were made for annexation to the City. Motion carried. jl! REMOVAL OF TREE, FRONT OF SILVERSTEIN BUILDING, ON EL CAMINO REAL, 200 E'T SOUTH OF 11' `115IPPLE AVENUE. Division of Highways had reviewed this and did not consider the tree and were unwillin to grant Mr. g Silverstein's request, stating that a traffic hazard trees add greatly to the beautification of the State Highway system as well as all city streets and for this reason were at all times protected. Mr. Silverstein stated his business and sign could not be displayed and seen because of the tree and offered to plant a smaller tree, or flowering tree in its place if he would be permitted to remove it. Councilman Spillers moved that errrdt be ranted seconded b Councilman P.1or an �1 ++ : P P g Y , providing this did not interfere with nny laws of the Highway Commission, however, I, i l �;.li,, ; I• City Attorney stated the Highway Commission had control over landscape areas and trees, !1i which was a condition in the las Maintenance Agreement executed between the City and j "1�! I ;r x•', Division,of Highways. Councilman Royer suggested amendment to motion including that letter be written to State recommending that the tree be removed which was accepted 1�, { by maker and second. Councilman Granger thought minutes should show that Mr. Silverstein should plant tree approved by the Park Department and if this was not done the Park ll 11 Department whould plant one at Pr. Si lverstein s expense., . "! MRS. SCHULBA ASKED ABOUT CIRCULATING PETITION IF PEOPLE TURNED IT DOWN BECAUSE OF REQUEST k l l.�' li!,,, OF STORM DRAINS. Council thought they should have both storm and sanitary sewers. l '!' ,r, Mrs. Schulba stated their property would be dead if this did not go through as they had been refused septic tank permit by the Health Department. There were 30 parcels of h1 �� land, City Engineer was to go ahead with complete plans with theunderstanding that some parts could be deleted if necessary at a later date. ii'''i RESOLUTION 1070 APPROVING AGREEIVTENT WITH K. LUND, FRIENDLY ACRES relating to subdivision �I i�f'• � s g of certain property on 17th Avenue was offered and moved for adoption by Councilman II Ifi': rr;r Morgan, seconded by Councilman Spillers and carried on roll call. C' ? iti SWIIuI POOL, RE FEIdCE ENCLOSING WADING POOL. It was recommended that fence be moved back with slab ;,• !` ! : and .Councilman Spillers moved that they proceed with job, cost not to i exceed x}800,. seconded by Councilman Granger and- carried. 1 � L'JM. G. PHOENIX OFFER TO BUY LOTS 26, 27, 32 and 33, BLOCK 21 11T.1'J. & i4t referred to the ffI ' !li !''�V`!I Real Estate Committee on motion of Councilman Morgan, seconded by Councilman Jones ; s,,! `• and carried. Councilman Herkner reported that they had already set a minimum Price a:" I. +. 0f $350 each on these '�i' �!��'I; �.. ail l�ll •��I•i,' e lots.